IRV Editorials
October 23rd 2004Reform idea: Run-off elections might be an improvement
Corvallis Gazette-Times (OR)
Editorial promotes IRV to counter spoiler problemOctober 21st 2004
Votes would carry more weight with instant runoff
Detroit Free Press
Editorial support for IRV in Ferndale.October 21st 2004
Votes would carry more weight with instant runoff
Detroit Free Press
By voting Yes on Proposal B, Ferndale voters would introduce instant-runoff voting into the city's elections.October 14th 2004
Kansas could gain from election reform
The Wichita Eagle
Changing the electoral system to full representation would improve our democracy.September 22nd 2004
Spoiler Nader b-a-a-c-k
Bradenton Herald (FL)
Newspaper urges lawmakers to get to the heart of the spoiler problemSeptember 8th 2004
A better way to settle primaries
Star News OnlineAugust 16th 2004
Second Place Can Win
Bangor Daily News
Newspaper argues for IRV, against spoiler problemAugust 15th 2004
Our View: Primary runoff system needed
The Steamboat PilotJuly 24th 2004
Detergent for Political Dirty Tricks
Portland OregonianMay 16th 2004
An instant improvement
Provo Daily Herald
An editorial that praises IRV as a system that will represent individual voters opinions betterMarch 11th 2004
Instant Runoff Voting: Let Roseville Voters Try it
Star Tribune (MN)
A five-candidate special election prompts call for IRVMarch 10th 2004
IRV is as easy as 1, 2, 3
pulsetc.com
Instant runoff voting is both simply and effective, it allows voters to make the best decision without confusing them in any way, Minneapolis should use instant runoff voting in future elections.[ Previous ] [ Next ]