The Colorado legislature on May 6th gave final passage to HB 1378, a bill to allow all Colorado municipalities and special districts to use instant runoff voting and choice voting. A model for other states, the bill was drafted as a result of recommendations from a legislature-initiated task force on voting methods last year that reviewed a wide array of voting methods, including alternative single-winner methods like approval voting and range voting.Kudos to Colorado advocates such as Common Cause's Elena Nunez, FairVote Colorado's Rick Van Wie, state representative John Kefalas and senate majority leader Ken Gordon. Two Colorado localities -- Basalt and Aspen -- already have adopted instant runoff voting for mayoral elections.
[Colorado Voter Choice Task Force Report]
[Bill history for HB 1378]
[Commentary in favor of instant runoff voting in Denver]
[Commentary in favor of instant runoff voting in Aspen]






On May 1, London held its third mayoral election using a form of instant
runoff voting. The Conservative Party's Boris Johnson defeated Labor
Party incumbent Ken Livingstone, winning 53% to 47% in the instant
runoff. This election had the city's best turnout ever -- a 20% increase
compared to the 2004 elections.
A federal district court judge recently found the Village of Port Chester, New York liable for a
violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. The village, which is
approximately 46.2% Hispanic, currently uses a staggered at-large
voting system, and has never elected a Hispanic person to one of its
seven Board of Trustees seats. The village is now seeking a proportional voting remedy, and FairVote has filed two amicus briefs highlighting the benefits of such a proposal. Choice voting, in particular, has a long history of use in New York City, thereby making it a particularly attractive remedy for a Voting Rights Act lawsuit.