BusinessWeek
Special Report - Democracy in America: Does Your Vote Matter?
By
Richard S. Dunham, Lee Walczak, Paula Dwyer
June 16, 2004
Is an election crisis looming this year? It's a distinct possibility, since
little has changed since 2000. The good news: The process can be revitalized
When Americans troop to the polls on November 2, most will take pride in being
part of a hallowed ritual of democracy. It's hard to argue that such patriotic
feelings are not justified. But as the nation girds for Election Day, something
is amiss in the land of Madison and Jefferson. In some very basic ways, the
delicate mechanism of our democracy has come unsprung. It is time to take an
unblinking look at our political landscape -- and assess the growing symptoms of
dysfunction. What is amazing is how little has changed since November, 2000. The
underlying problems that led to the Presidential election crisis still exist and
could stretch on for years.
What has changed is hardly for the better. The country is even more split among
politically polarized regions. Republicans dominate "Red" states of
the Deep South, much of the Farm Belt, and the Mountain West. Democrats control
"Blue" states along the coasts. Meanwhile, the number of swing states
has dwindled to 17 or 18 -- effectively disenfranchising millions of voters
residing in the "already decided" areas.
To make matters worse, an Electoral College system conceived by the Founders as
an insulating mechanism between a landed aristocracy and the masses makes more
2000-style fiascoes distinctly possible. With Democrats and Republicans at
parity, either party's candidate could again triumph in the popular vote while
losing in the Electoral College. Such an outcome could spawn a crisis of
legitimacy, dog the "winner" for the duration of his term, and
reinforce doubts about government by the people and for the people. Who loses?
Everybody.
Voice for the Voiceless
Inside those Red Zones and Blue Zones, political competition is being
systematically snuffed out as the major parties redesign congressional district
lines into genetically engineered safe havens. Thanks to pernicious
gerrymandering, only 35 seats at best out of 435 are even remotely in play this
year. The result: growing voter disenchantment over the lack of choice and yet
another sign that democracy is in trouble.
The good news is that democracy is a living organism that can be revitalized.
The most obvious solution: Give voice to the voiceless by dispensing with the
musty Electoral College, which artificially magnifies the clout of sparsely
populated states.
While we're replacing the Electoral College with direct Presidential elections,
we should also revamp the undemocratic method the parties use to select
standard-bearers. The dominance of Iowa and New Hampshire -- two small and
not-terribly-representative throwbacks to Norman Rockwell America -- distorts
the entire race, forcing contenders to shape issues designed to catch fire with
the locals. The primary calendar should be retooled into a series of
competitions that give voters in other regions a stake in the nomination. At the
same time, voting technology should be wrenched into this century with a guiding
hand from Washington, a dollop of cash for new equipment, and smart thinking
about security standards for the coming age of e-voting.
Finally, our scandalous system for funding campaigns, a throwback to the
buy-a-vote days of yore, could stand another massive dose of reform. Of course,
asking lawmakers to curb new soft-money groups, fix the near-broke Presidential
campaign fund, and help challengers have a shot at dug-in incumbents is like
asking them to saw off an arm. Reform requires a recognition that there exists
something called the national interest -- and demands a rare moment of vision by
Capitol Hill's shameless partisans.
Unless we want to continue on the path we're treading -- declining
participation, permanent incumbency, less competition for ideas, increased
balkanization, and more big-money politics -- reform isn't an option. It is
perhaps the most urgent priority facing the republic as it lurches into the
harsh light of a new century burdened by a political system that seems less
democratic by the day.
|