The New York Times
September 28, 2004
Barriers to Student Voting
New York Times Editorial
In the last presidential election, about 37 percent of citizens between the ages
of 18 and 24 voted, a sharp decline from 1972, when more than half did. The
relatively low participation rate of young people is often attributed to apathy
or the distraction of other things in their lives. But a lack of support, and
sometimes outright hostility, from elections officials is a significant factor.
With issues like the Iraq war and budget deficits that could last for decades in
the forefront of the presidential campaign, young people have more reason than
ever to fight for their right to vote - and to cast their ballots on Nov. 2.
It is nice to think that elections officials want to do everything they can
to help young voters. But the truth is, many cities and towns with colleges and
universities regard student voters - who are more transient than the average
resident, and whose political views also may be different - as a challenge to
the established order. As a result, local elections officials often discourage
students from registering and voting from their campus addresses, even though
the Supreme Court has ruled that they have the right to do so.
In Texas this year, a county district attorney threatened to prosecute
students from Prairie View A&M University if they tried to register. The
students had to file a lawsuit before he withdrew the threat and apologized. A
student at Hamilton College in Utica, N.Y., was told that he was not a
"permanent resident" and had to vote from his parents' home in another
state. And a Fox affiliate in Tucson recently carried a report quoting an
elections official who warned, falsely, that University of Arizona students who
registered from their dorms might be committing a felony.
Even when they are not actively discouraging young voters, election officials
are often unwilling to take steps to make it easier for them to vote. They often
resist appeals to put polling places on campus, one of the best ways to make
students feel included in the electoral process. And they devote too few
resources to registration drives among students, whose rapid turnover makes them
a group that requires special attention.
College and university administrators also bear some of the blame. Under the
Higher Education Act of 1998, colleges and universities receiving federal funds
must make a good-faith effort to distribute voter registration forms to every
student, and to make those forms widely available on campus. But a newly
released study by Harvard University's Institute of Politics and the Chronicle
of Higher Education found that fewer than 17 percent of schools are in full
compliance, and one-third are not even making minimal efforts.
An array of public-minded groups, like the New Voters Project, Declare
Yourself and Rock the Vote, are working this year to register and mobilize young
voters. Their efforts are much needed, and they appear to be paying off. The
nonpartisan New Voters Project says it has already registered more than 122,000
young voters in Wisconsin, where the margin of victory in the 2000 presidential
race was fewer than 6,000 votes. But these groups are reporting that elections
offices in several states have a large backlog of registrations to process.
These offices should immediately hire temporary workers, if necessary, to ensure
that everyone who met the registration deadline is on the voting rolls by Nov.
2.
Grass-roots efforts like the New Voters Project are important, but reaching
out to young voters should not be left to volunteers. Elections officials and
institutions of higher education must do more to remove the barriers that still
too often stand between young people and the ballot box.
|