The Center for Voting and Democracy is encouraged with the
increased interest expressed by the general public and elected
officials in the effort to upgrade and improve our election
process.
We are a member of a coalition of civil rights and reform
organizations
that monitors standards and laws
concerning new purchases of voting equipment and modernization
of voting machines. The coalition includes: the Asian
American Legal Defense and Education Fund, Brennan Center for
Justice, Committee for the Study of the American Electorate,
Demos, Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, National
Asian Pacific American Legal Consortium, Puerto Rican Legal
Defense and Education Fund, and U.S. Public Interest Research
Group.
We believe that the great interest in election
adminstration reform provides an excellent opportunity to lift
our nation's voting equipment to new heights and propose
several features to help achieve this goal. We support federal
and state requirements that all new voting equipment and
software have the following features:
-
Have a
precinct-based, error-correcting capacity to ensure that
voters have the opportunity to correct or avoid any errors,
such as over-votes and under-votes
-
Be flexible
enough to handle all ballot types currently used in the
United States, including cumulative voting and ranked choice
ballots
-
Provide full
accessibility to people with
disabilities
-
Ensure ballots
can be read and understood with minimal assistance by people
whose level of literacy is low and by people whose primary
language is other than English.
In
recognition of this increased interest we conducted a survey
of voting equipment vendors, specifically those providing
newer electronic technology (e.g. Direct Record Electronic-DRE
and Opitical Scan). We focused on the features listed
above, not the broader voting equipment issues. We
recognize there are many other concerns, such as: cost,
availability, certification status, etc.
The survey is intended to provide the specific
information essential to evaluate the capability of equipment
to meet the requirements of cumulative voting and ranked
choice ballots.
The "Issues/Questions" compared for specific
voting equipment are:
-
Vendor Indentification
-
Voting Equipment--what types of equipment
(DRE, Optical Scan) does the vendor currently offer for sale
to local and state governments for public elections?
-
Ballot Types--can the equipment handle
cumulative voting and ranked choice ballots?
-
Accessibility for Disabilities--does the
equipment provide full accessibility to voters with
disabilities?
-
Language Capability--does the equipment
provide capability for the ballot to be read by voters whose
level of literacy is low and/or whose primary language is
other than English?
-
Ballot Image
Storage--does the equipment have the capability to record
and store the ballot image
electronically?
The information received from the vendors is
provided in Table I. We have also listed vendors from
whom we are awaiting responses in Table
II. |