September 7th 2003
IRV can reform voting
Berkshire Eagle

Support instant runoff voting to avoid winning candidates who only receive a plurality--not a majority--of the votes. By letting voters rank candidates, IRV minimizes the cost of campaigning, is constitutional, and complies with one-person-one vote.

September 5th 2003
Analysis: Texas remap feud may harm state
United Press International

Article suggesting that the Texas redistricting battle will harm the state by making it harder for the parties to work together in the legislature.

September 2nd 2003
Bureaucrats Stall IRV in San Francisco

September 2nd 2003
Bureaucrats stall IRV in San Francisco: Elected and unelected officials nationwide block reform legislation
Working for Change

FairVote Co-Founders Rob Richie and Steven Hill reflect on the initial failure to pass instant runoff voting in San Francisco, and look at the methods to reinvigorate the project.

August 27th 2003
Don't bury IRV

IRV is a badly needed reform, and it's crucial to start moving now to have the people and plans in place to ensure it happens next year.

August 27th 2003
Voting as usual: S.F. officials won't implement election reform this year - and maybe not even next year - in defiance of the public will
San Francisco Bay Guardian

San Francisco elections officials have illegally thwarted the will of city voters to implement an instant-runoff voting system this year.

August 25th 2003
Help California Vote!
Capital Commentary

The chaos surrounding California's gubernatorial election crisis could be mended through the implmentation of instant runoff voting and proportional representation.

August 23rd 2003
Ruling Party Wins Cambodian Election
Voice of America News

August 21st 2003
Law could change McHenry board
Pioneer Press

The merits of cumulative voting are under review in McHenry County.

August 21st 2003
Judge denies instant election runoff Though illegal, S.F. voters' wish not granted for Nov. 4 mayoral ballot
San Francisco Chronicle

A San Francisco Superior Court judge agreed with city elections officials Wednesday that they should not enact a new voter-mandated instant runoff system for the November election even though they will be violating the law.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]

IRV Soars in Twin Cities, FairVote Corrects the Pundits on Meaning of Election Night '09
Election Day '09 was a roller-coaster for election reformers.  Instant runoff voting had a great night in Minnesota, where St. Paul voters chose to implement IRV for its city elections, and Minneapolis voters used IRV for the first time—with local media touting it as a big success. As the Star-Tribune noted in endorsing IRV for St. Paul, Tuesday’s elections give the Twin Cities a chance to show the whole state of Minnesota the benefits of adopting IRV. There were disappointments in Lowell and Pierce County too, but high-profile multi-candidate races in New Jersey and New York keep policymakers focused on ways to reform elections;  the Baltimore Sun and Miami Herald were among many newspapers publishing commentary from FairVote board member and former presidential candidate John Anderson on how IRV can mitigate the problems of plurality elections.

And as pundits try to make hay out of the national implications of Tuesday’s gubernatorial elections, Rob Richie in the Huffington Post concludes that the gubernatorial elections have little bearing on federal elections.

Links