Choice Voting Passes By Over 1000 VotesBy Ben Antonius
Published February 21st 2003 in California Aggie
Students approved the Choice Voting Amendment by an overwhelming majority this week, giving the go-ahead for an overhaul of ASUCD's current elections procedures. After announcing the total of 4,029 votes - slightly lower than last year's 18.6 percent voter turnout - Elections Committee Chair Katie
Barbero
announced that the CVA passed, falling one vote shy of a two-to-one
margin; 2,005 students voted in favor and 1,003 students voted against
the ballot reform measure, which will establish a ranking system for
candidates in future elections.
For presidential elections,
Instant Runoff Voting will be implemented - a ranking system that
eliminates tiebreakers in executive elections.
On a
day when the Student Focus slate took the presidency and boasted the
top five vote-getters for ASUCD Senate, CVA author Sonny Mohammadzadeh
said his amendment would temper such "lopsided" results.
"Student
Focus took five of the six senate seats," he said. "That's 83 percent
of the seats. I don't think 83 percent of the campus rated Student
Focus that highly."
Under the Choice Voting
system, voters rank candidates in order of preference rather than
simply selecting a handful, as under the current system.
Mohammadzadeh
said he hoped another result of the CVA would be that, since candidates
have to be ranked highly in order to win, they would choose to run
issue-based - rather than slate-based - campaigns.
ASUCD
Vice President-elect Kalen Gallagher expressed some concern that what
he called "definitely a more complicated system" would discourage
voting.
"Without making some educational outreach efforts, this
[system] could lead to a really confusing election, and drive turnout
lower," he said.
The total of 4,029 votes is less than half the number cast in the fall 2002 election. The presidential election usually drives winter voter turnout higher than fall's, but this election's 18.2 percent turnout pales in comparison to the 38.7 percent fall 2002 turnout, due in no small part to the Campus Expansion Initiative that was on the fall ballot.
"I don't think people should have any trouble understanding [the system]," Simpson said. "I think it will really help diversify the senate, and it should give independents a better chance."
Independent candidates have rarely fared well in senate elections. Lindsay Crawford won a seat at the senate table without a major slate affiliation in fall 2001, but since then, no independents have been elected.
"This will be a turning point in UCD elections," Mohammadzadeh said. "In the long run it will be a good thing for the senate and the presidency."
Election Day '09 was a roller-coaster for election reformers. Instant runoff voting had a great night in Minnesota, where St. Paul voters chose to implement IRV for its city elections, and Minneapolis voters used IRV for the first time—with local media touting it as a big success. As the Star-Tribune noted in endorsing IRV for St. Paul, Tuesday’s elections give the Twin Cities a chance to show the whole state of Minnesota the benefits of adopting IRV. There were disappointments in Lowell and Pierce County too, but high-profile multi-candidate races in New Jersey and New York keep policymakers focused on ways to reform elections; the Baltimore Sun and Miami Herald were among many newspapers publishing commentary from FairVote board member and former presidential candidate John Anderson on how IRV can mitigate the problems of plurality elections.