Rep. Davis Cites Fresh Interest in D.C. Voting Rights, Including from Bush


By Lori Montgomery
Published December 17th 2005 in Washington Post

Legislation that would give the District a vote in Congress is gaining fresh support on Capitol Hill, and its sponsor said yesterday that he is pressing hard to persuade the White House to back the legislation.

Rep. Thomas M. Davis III (R-Va.) said he is "still a ways" from putting the measure to a vote before his Government Reform Committee, the first step toward passage. But with 18 House co-sponsors, an expression of interest from the president and a new plan for expanding the House to accommodate the District's representative, "we have never been at this high-water mark before," Davis said.

"People like the concept," Davis told host Mark Plotkin on WTOP radio. "And I think there is a growing realization, even among people who don't like this bill, that you can't spend billions of dollars to bring democracy to Baghdad and not have a vote in the nation's capital."

Davis has battled for years to bring voting representation to the District. He said he raised the issue with President Bush at an event Tuesday in Virginia. Bush opposes giving the District a voice in the Senate. But when Davis explained that his bill would only affect the House, Bush replied: "That puts a little bit different light on it" and asked for more information, the congressman said.

"If we get the White House behind it -- and we're a long way from doing that, but we're engaged -- that could make a huge difference," Davis said.

The bill would expand the House temporarily from 435 seats to 437, giving a vote to Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) and adding a fourth member from Utah, which was the state next in line for a seat after the 2000 Census. Under the measure, the House would revert to 435 seats in the next reapportionment before the 2012 election, with the District keeping its vote.

By coupling the interests of the Democratic District with Republican Utah, Davis had hoped to unlock a partisan logjam. But the bill stirred fears among Democrats that an extra seat in Utah would permit the state's Republicans to redraw districts, threatening the seat of Utah's lone Democratic congressman, Jim Matheson.

Yesterday, Davis offered a solution: Make the new Utah representative run statewide, which would keep congressional districts intact.

Utah Republicans, including Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr., are "very comfortable" with the idea, Davis said. Matheson, through an aide, called the idea "very interesting" but declined to take a position.

Advocates for D.C. voting rights hailed the proposal. "It's definitely a breakthrough and a significant change," said Ilir Zherka, executive director of D.C. Vote. "Hopefully, it will lead to Democrats saying, 'Okay, this problem's off the table. Now let's talk about the bill itself.' "

Norton, who has opposed the Davis bill, is less optimistic, said spokeswoman Doxie A. McCoy. Although talks between Norton and Davis are leading "in a positive direction," McCoy said, opposition from House GOP leaders is a greater obstacle than nervous Democrats.

"The Republicans are in control," McCoy said. "The Democrats don't control the Congress."

IRV Soars in Twin Cities, FairVote Corrects the Pundits on Meaning of Election Night '09
Election Day '09 was a roller-coaster for election reformers.  Instant runoff voting had a great night in Minnesota, where St. Paul voters chose to implement IRV for its city elections, and Minneapolis voters used IRV for the first time—with local media touting it as a big success. As the Star-Tribune noted in endorsing IRV for St. Paul, Tuesday’s elections give the Twin Cities a chance to show the whole state of Minnesota the benefits of adopting IRV. There were disappointments in Lowell and Pierce County too, but high-profile multi-candidate races in New Jersey and New York keep policymakers focused on ways to reform elections;  the Baltimore Sun and Miami Herald were among many newspapers publishing commentary from FairVote board member and former presidential candidate John Anderson on how IRV can mitigate the problems of plurality elections.

And as pundits try to make hay out of the national implications of Tuesday’s gubernatorial elections, Rob Richie in the Huffington Post concludes that the gubernatorial elections have little bearing on federal elections.

Links