A voting misunderstanding

By Paul Fidalgo
Published September 6th 2007 in Vallejo Times-Herald
In its editorial "2008 vote: Electoral College is flawed, but so is this tinkering" (Sept. 1), the Times-Herald gets the California scheme to allocate electoral votes by congressional district just right in characterizing it as a power-grab. However, it also espouses a common misunderstanding about the National Popular Vote Compact when stating that it is "a flawed approach at best and could result in all of California's votes being cast for someone that the state's voters had rejected."

The truth is that the compact would nullify the Electoral College altogether, and once enacted it would ensure that literally every Californian's vote would count equally. What happens to the electoral votes of a given state should be viewed as mere technicality, because implementation of the compact would turn the College into a simple formality, leaving election of the president up to every single American, regardless of where they happen to reside.

Paul Fidalgo, Communications Director
FairVote - The Center for Voting and Democracy
Takoma Park, MD

Sierra Club National Popular Vote Resolution
WHEREAS, the mission of the Sierra Club is to explore, enjoy and protect the planet through grassroots participation in politics and government; and

WHEREAS,  presidential candidates focus their efforts and resources only in battleground states.

WHEREAS, two-thirds of the states receive little to no attention in a competitive presidential election.

THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Sierra Club supports National Popular Vote state legislation that will elect the President of the United States by popular vote.

BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Sierra Club supports election of the President of the United States by direct popular vote.