2008 Campaign Tracker
Following is a listing of the times the major party nominees for president and vice president visited each state from September 5, the day after the Republican presidential convention, to November 4. This information was compiled from the Washington Post and is based on publicly available information from media reports, campaigns, and other sources. Some events--particularly fundraisers--may not be included in the data, as they are often unannounced.Visits to states not included in the chart include Sarah Palin's two visits to her home state of Alaska, Joe Biden's four visits to his home state of Delaware, and the visits by each candidate corresponding to the debates in Mississippi, Missouri, Tennessee, and New York.

Press Release Series: The Swing States of America

        
  12/4/08 - 2008's Shrinking Battleground
10/29/08 - 99% of 2008 Presidential Campaign Visits in Only 17 States

10/22/08 - With two weeks to go, presidential candidates spoil six lucky states

10/17/08 - In the "Swing States of America," Candidates Ignore a Majority of States and Follow Voting Patterns of 2004 Presidential Election

10/9/08 - Candidates Focus Their Times and Resources on a Handful of States and Follow Voting Patterns of 2004 Presidential Election

2008 Presidential Ad Spending
State Obama 
Biden  
Democrat 

McCain 
Palin  
Republican 

All Visits*
Alabama 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Alaska 0 0 0
0 0
0

0
Arizona 0 0 0
2
0 2

2
Arkansas 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
California 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Colorado 5
3
8

5
4
9

17
Connecticut 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Delaware 0 0
0

0 0 0
0
District of Columbia 0 1 1
0 0 0
1
Florida 12
5
17

8
5
13

30
Georgia 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Hawaii 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Idaho 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Illinois 1
0 1

0 0 0
1
Indiana 4
2
6

1
3
4

10
Iowa 1
0 1

4
3
7

8
Kansas 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Kentucky 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Louisiana 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Maine 0 0 0
0 1
1

1
Maryland 0 1
1

0 0 0
1
Massachusetts 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Michigan 3 2 5
4 3 7
12
Minnesota 0 0 0
1
0
1

1
Mississippi 0
0 0

0
0 0

0
Missouri 3
5
8

4
4
8

16
Montana 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Nebraska 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Nevada 4
1
5

1
3
4

9
New Hampshire 3
3
6

2
1
3

9
New Jersey 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
New Mexico 2
1
3

5
1
6

9
New York 3
1 4

4
2
6

10
North Carolina 5
3
8

2
3
5

13
North Dakota 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Ohio 6
9
15

9
11
20

35
Oklahoma 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Oregon 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Pennsylvania 4
5
9

11
9
20

29
Rhode Island 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
South Carolina 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
South Dakota 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Tennessee 0
0 0

1
0 1

1
Texas 0 1
1

0 0 0
1
Utah 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Vermont 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Virginia 9
6
15

3
3
6

21
Washington 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
West Virginia 0 1
1

0 0 0
1
Wisconsin 2 0 2
5
4
9

11
Wyoming 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Total







           249

*Information in this chart is based on data from The Washington Post 2008 Campaign Tracker. Visits and fundraisers documented in alternative news sources may not be included. Any portion of a day spent in a state constitutes a visit to that state. For example, if a candidate spends one day in Alabama and has two rallies on that day, this is documented as a single visit to Alabama. Multiple events held in one state on the same day are considered a single visit. Consecutive days spent in a single state are considered multiple visits. For example, if a candidate holds a rally on Monday and holds a speech on Tuesday, both in Alabama, each day constitutes its own visit, and the candidate therefore has two visits to Alabama. For the purposes of our research non-traditional campaign events such as fundraisers, visits to candidates' home states, schedule debates, and work-related visits are excluded from the data.
 
July 13th 2009
Albatross of U.S. democracy
Indianapolis Star

FairVote research is cited in support of the National Popular Vote plan in Indiana, because "every vote cast for president should be equally important and equally coveted, whether it originates in California, Connecticut or Crawfordsville."

July 9th 2009
Winner-take-all can elect a second-place president
San Diego Union-Tribune

The founder of National Popular Vote lays out the shortcomings and injustices of the Electoral College system, and shows why the National Popular Vote plan is the right solution.

May 17th 2009
Why states should adopt the National Popular Vote plan for president
San Diego Union-Tribune

FairVote's Rob Richie writes that the Electoral College deepens political inequality, and explains why the National Popular Vote plan is our best opportunity to ensure that every vote for president is equally valued.

May 14th 2009
Let's Make Every Vote Count
The Nation

Katrina vanden Heuvel, editor of the Nation magazine, highlights FairVote's research in an important piece on the "broad support" growing in the states for the National Popular Vote plan to elect the president.

May 13th 2009
Representative Democracy: Two Steps Forward
The Daily Herald

The executive director of the Economic Opportunity Institute heralds the passage of the National Popular Vote bill in Washington state.

[ Next ]