Student Voting
Political apathy and subsequent low voter turnout of youth (18-29) is often cited as fact. Many decry their political disengagement and apparent laziness, but recent election cycles have presented a very different and much more troubling reason for why many youth do not vote.

Across the country, students reported that they were subjected to increased scrutiny, unequal treatment, and at times outright harassment when they attempted to register to vote or cast a ballot on Election Day. Such acts of voter intimidation and suppression are particularly distressing because most of the targeted individuals are registering to vote for the first time and are unfamiliar with election laws.

Despite the fact that every college student is entitled to register to vote at the residence he or she considers "home," including a campus residence, many college communities actively prevent college students from registering to vote where they attend school. Students around the country have faced difficulty registering to vote because of local officials. In the case of historically African-American Prairie View A&M in Texas, the District Attorney publicly stated that if students attempted to register to vote they would be prosecuted for voter fraud.

Common tactics used to dissuade students from registering to vote include:
  • Misinformation - telling college students they cannot register where they attend school or that if they register to vote at school they could be in jeopardy of losing financial aid, or that they are only able to vote where their parents pay taxes
  • Residency requirement legislation - The New Hampshire legislature passed a law after the 2000 presidential election that required newly registered voters to register their car and obtain a New Hampshire driver's license within 60 days or face criminal prosecution
Not only do students face challenges when trying to register to vote, but they also face challenges on Election Day.  In some instances, poll watchers have challenged students who are registered to vote by asking them to sign an affidavit affirming their citizenship and that they will only vote once. Long lines plagued many college campus polling places during the 2004, 2006 and 2008 election cycles.

Although students are not traditionally considered a targeted demographic for voter suppression, it is clear that they, too, face many hurdles when attempting to register and vote.

 
Articles on Student Voting
May 27th 2002
Let's Go IRV!
The Nation

Instant runoff voting (IRV), the only way to make each and every vote count, is spreading throughout cities and college campuses with the help of FairVote contends Jim Hightower.

May 12th 2002
Cumulative vote results mixed
Amarillo Globe-News

A voting system intended to help minorities get elected primarily benefited an incumbent white man and a Hispanic woman in the recent Amarillo Independent School District board of trustees election.

May 11th 2002
A way around runoffs
New Jersey Star-Ledger

The high cost and low voter turnout of runoff elections calls for instant runoff voting (IRV), a system practiced in Australia, Ireland, and now San Fransisco that eliminates the need for runoff elections.

May 8th 2002
Utah GOP alters vote method
Deseret News

Preferential voting comes to Utah and has a substantive impact on local elections.

May 8th 2002
Advocate drops drive for 'instant runoff' initiative
Missoulian

Matthew Singer's proposal of instant runoff voting (IRV) for elections in Montana has been withdrawn to reduce the overabundance of ballot issues.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]