Student Voting
Political apathy and subsequent low voter turnout of youth (18-29) is often cited as fact. Many decry their political disengagement and apparent laziness, but recent election cycles have presented a very different and much more troubling reason for why many youth do not vote.

Across the country, students reported that they were subjected to increased scrutiny, unequal treatment, and at times outright harassment when they attempted to register to vote or cast a ballot on Election Day. Such acts of voter intimidation and suppression are particularly distressing because most of the targeted individuals are registering to vote for the first time and are unfamiliar with election laws.

Despite the fact that every college student is entitled to register to vote at the residence he or she considers "home," including a campus residence, many college communities actively prevent college students from registering to vote where they attend school. Students around the country have faced difficulty registering to vote because of local officials. In the case of historically African-American Prairie View A&M in Texas, the District Attorney publicly stated that if students attempted to register to vote they would be prosecuted for voter fraud.

Common tactics used to dissuade students from registering to vote include:
  • Misinformation - telling college students they cannot register where they attend school or that if they register to vote at school they could be in jeopardy of losing financial aid, or that they are only able to vote where their parents pay taxes
  • Residency requirement legislation - The New Hampshire legislature passed a law after the 2000 presidential election that required newly registered voters to register their car and obtain a New Hampshire driver's license within 60 days or face criminal prosecution
Not only do students face challenges when trying to register to vote, but they also face challenges on Election Day.  In some instances, poll watchers have challenged students who are registered to vote by asking them to sign an affidavit affirming their citizenship and that they will only vote once. Long lines plagued many college campus polling places during the 2004, 2006 and 2008 election cycles.

Although students are not traditionally considered a targeted demographic for voter suppression, it is clear that they, too, face many hurdles when attempting to register and vote.

 
Articles on Student Voting
October 23rd 2002
Green Party criticizes corporate influence
The Michigan Daily

U.S. Senate Green party candidate Eric Borregard discusses instant runoff voting (IRV) and the spoiler effect problem Michigan faces in the November 5th election.

October 23rd 2002
Candidates for secretary of state campaign
Wood-TV

The article compares Michigan's secretary of state candidates' opinions and promises regarding appropriate changes for the state's voting system.

October 22nd 2002
Carefully choosing his votes
Hampshire Gazette

Voters in Northampton and in Hampshire Districts will vote on a ballot question asking them whether they support instituting instant runoff voting in statewide races.

October 21st 2002
Pollina hoping for better this time
Vermont Press Bureau

Chris Pearson, as campaign manager for pro-instant runoff voting (IRV) Progressive candidate for Vermont lieutenant governor Anthony Pollina, demonstrates the difficulties of running a third party campaign and not being labeled a "spoiler."

October 21st 2002
House election focus local
Washington Times

FairVote's Rob Richie is quoted, disucssing how 2002 House of Representative elections will be a close call because of low voter participation. The elections may be more dependent upon local issues than normal.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]