More Options
We hear all too often that voters feel they must decide between the “lesser of two evils”.  In part, that is due to the strategic thinking that must be employed in the Electoral system.  It is also inherant in the process of selecting a vice presidential candidate.

When a presidential candidate is looking for a running mate, few considerations will impact the number of feasible choices as much as geography.  Vice Presidential candidates today are picked based on what they bring to the ticket regionally – they come to the ticket assuming they will carry their home state and possibly a few around it. For example North Carolinian John Edwards was selected to be John Kerry's running mate in 2004 in large part because John Kerry wanted to increase his competitiveness in the South, a region that had been swept by George W. Bush four years earlier.  With direct election, the home state advantage will not play a strong role, opening up the option of selecting the best candidate regardless of geographic location. 

Vague Values

Electoral Replacements

Electoral Tie

Favorite Son Effect

A Few States Wins


Constitutional Residence

State Size

Special Interests

Power of State Legislatures

Unlucky Luck

Ignoring Your Vote

 
Electoral College Table of Contents


 
October 3rd 2004
Electoral College flunks fairness test in big states
The Provience Journal

September 27th 2004
The Colorado Solution
The Boston Globe

September 24th 2004
Time to change the Electoral College?
North Lake Tahoe Bonanza

September 19th 2004
Colorado considers dividing its 9 Electoral College votes
Seattle Times

Voters will decide in November whether Colorado should become the first to divide its electoral votes for president according to the popular vote.

September 19th 2004
Coloradans to Consider Splitting Electoral College Votes
New York Times

[ Previous ] [ Next ]