More Options
We hear all too often that voters feel they must decide between the “lesser of two evils”.  In part, that is due to the strategic thinking that must be employed in the Electoral system.  It is also inherant in the process of selecting a vice presidential candidate.

When a presidential candidate is looking for a running mate, few considerations will impact the number of feasible choices as much as geography.  Vice Presidential candidates today are picked based on what they bring to the ticket regionally – they come to the ticket assuming they will carry their home state and possibly a few around it. For example North Carolinian John Edwards was selected to be John Kerry's running mate in 2004 in large part because John Kerry wanted to increase his competitiveness in the South, a region that had been swept by George W. Bush four years earlier.  With direct election, the home state advantage will not play a strong role, opening up the option of selecting the best candidate regardless of geographic location. 

Vague Values

Electoral Replacements

Electoral Tie

Favorite Son Effect

A Few States Wins


Constitutional Residence

State Size

Special Interests

Power of State Legislatures

Unlucky Luck

Ignoring Your Vote

 
Electoral College Table of Contents


 
October 17th 2004
Peculiar Institution
The Boston Globe

October 14th 2004
Kansas could gain from election reform
The Wichita Eagle

Changing the electoral system to full representation would improve our democracy.

October 8th 2004
Improve on Red vs. Blue
Washington Post

Rob Richie is quoted in support of proportional allocation of electoral votes.

October 4th 2004
Electoral College needs reform
The Modesto Bee

October 4th 2004
Bush v. Gore, Round 2
The New Republic

[ Previous ] [ Next ]