Student Voting
Political apathy and subsequent low voter turnout of youth (18-29) is often cited as fact. Many decry their political disengagement and apparent laziness, but recent election cycles have presented a very different and much more troubling reason for why many youth do not vote.

Across the country, students reported that they were subjected to increased scrutiny, unequal treatment, and at times outright harassment when they attempted to register to vote or cast a ballot on Election Day. Such acts of voter intimidation and suppression are particularly distressing because most of the targeted individuals are registering to vote for the first time and are unfamiliar with election laws.

Despite the fact that every college student is entitled to register to vote at the residence he or she considers "home," including a campus residence, many college communities actively prevent college students from registering to vote where they attend school. Students around the country have faced difficulty registering to vote because of local officials. In the case of historically African-American Prairie View A&M in Texas, the District Attorney publicly stated that if students attempted to register to vote they would be prosecuted for voter fraud.

Common tactics used to dissuade students from registering to vote include:
  • Misinformation - telling college students they cannot register where they attend school or that if they register to vote at school they could be in jeopardy of losing financial aid, or that they are only able to vote where their parents pay taxes
  • Residency requirement legislation - The New Hampshire legislature passed a law after the 2000 presidential election that required newly registered voters to register their car and obtain a New Hampshire driver's license within 60 days or face criminal prosecution
Not only do students face challenges when trying to register to vote, but they also face challenges on Election Day.  In some instances, poll watchers have challenged students who are registered to vote by asking them to sign an affidavit affirming their citizenship and that they will only vote once. Long lines plagued many college campus polling places during the 2004, 2006 and 2008 election cycles.

Although students are not traditionally considered a targeted demographic for voter suppression, it is clear that they, too, face many hurdles when attempting to register and vote.

 
Articles on Student Voting
August 1st 2006
International Snapshot: Poland

Parliamentary Elections, September 2005

July 31st 2006
N.Y. Lawmakers Aim To Curb Electoral College
New York Sun

Article highlights the introduction of the national popular vote in New York and mentions FairVote as one of the lead organizations behind the bill.

July 28th 2006
Justice Department Reaches Agreement With Pennsylvania to Protect Voting Rights of Military and Overseas Citizens
www.usnewswire.com/

The Justice Department today announced that it has reached an agreement with Pennsylvania officials to help ensure that military and overseas voters have an opportunity to participate fully in the state's federal elections.

July 27th 2006
Third time's a charm for final approval of instant runoff pilots

North Carolina's state House joins the Senate in passing H.1024, a bill to implement instant runoff voting for statewide judicial office vacancy elections and to allow up to 10 cities and 10 counties to try IRV in 2007-2008.

July 25th 2006
N.C. House declines to agree with instant runoffs

The possibility of "instant runoffs" in North Carolina diminished Monday when the House set aside a Senate version of the bill that would require up to 20 counties or cities to try the method to choose runoff winners.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]