And The Last Shall Be First

The four elections in which the President-Elect lost the popular vote are: 

1824 – Adams over Jackson 

Popular vote margin: 44,804 - favoring Jackon

Electoral College margin: 15 - favoring Jackon


*John Q. Adams received fewer electoral votes and fewer popular votes than Andrew Jackson, but, as outlined by the Constitution, when no candidate receives the majority of the Electoral College vote the decision is turned over to the House of Representatives. There, 13 state delegations voted for John Q. Adams, 7 for Jackson and 3 for Crawford. (www.nara.gov)

1876 – Hayes over Tilden

Popular vote margin: 264,292 - favoring Tilden

Electoral College margin: 1 - electing Hayes


1888 – Harrison over Cleveland

Popular vote margin: 100,456 - favoring Cleveland

Electoral College margin: 65 - electing Harrison 


2000 – Bush over Gore

Popular vote margin: 543,895 (the largest so far) - favoring Gore

Electoral College margin: 5 - electing Bush


*Note: Some sources also consider 1960 a contested election. Although most believe Kennedy won the popular vote and the electoral college, some believe that there exists an alternative result that puts Nixon on top in popular votes. However, this election is not as harshly contested as the above four.

It is only luck that has saved us from more situations like these where the White House is not delivered to the President-Elect. Statistics show that close elections possess a very high possibility of this distorted result. Several elections throughout the 19th and 20th centuries have been so close that a small difference in votes – a fraction of 1 percent of the national vote – would have presented a different winner. 

Election Year Shift Needed In Which States
1828 11,517 Ohio, Kentucky, New York, Louisiana, Indiana
1840 8,386 New York, Pennsylvania, Maine, New Jersey
1844 2,555 New York
1848 3,227 Georgia, Maryland, Delaware
1864 38,111 New York, Pennsylvania, Indiana, Oregon, Wisconsin, Maryland, Connecticut
1868 29,862 Pennsylvania, Indiana, North Carolina, Alabama, Connecticut, California, Nevada
1880 10,517 New York
1884 575 New York
1892 37,364  New York, Indiana, Wisconsin, New Jersey, California
1896 20,296 Indiana, Kentucky, California, Delaware, Oregon, West Virginia
1900 74,755 Ohio, Indiana, Kansas, Nebraska, Maryland, Utah, Wyoming
1908 75,041 Ohio, Missouri, Indiana, Kansas, Delaware, West Virginia, Montana, Maryland
1916 1,983 California
1948 29,294 California, Ohio, Illinois
1960 11,424 Illinois, Missouri, New Mexico, Hawaii, Nevada
1976 9,246 Hawaii, Ohio

*Information from Why the Electoral College is Bad for America, George C. Edwards III


Ignoring Your Vote

More Options

Vague Values

Electoral Replacements

Electoral Tie

Favorite Son Effect

A Few States Wins

Constitutional Residence

State Size

Special Interests

Power of State Legislatures

 
Electoral College Table of Contents


 
August 12th 2007
States Try to Alter How Presidents Are Elected
New York Times

NY Times article on the attempt by California and North Carolina to award their Electoral College votes by congressional district. It draws on FairVote's report on the issue to outline the flaws of this method.

August 9th 2007
Fuzzy Math: Wrong Way Reforms for Allocating Electoral College Votes

August 7th 2007
A Red Play for the Golden State
Newsweek

Newsweek columnist Jonathan Alter explains how the proposal to award California's and North Carolina's electoral votes by congressional district are motivated by short-term political gain.

August 6th 2007
GOP eyes California's electoral pie
Los Angeles Times

The author explains why Republicans want California's electoral votes distributed by congressional districts. In a safely Democratic state, such a move will add an additional score votes to the Republicans' tally - the equivalent of winning Ohio.

August 2nd 2007
Votescam
The New Yorker

FairVote board member Hendrik Hertzberg writes on the folly of the statewide and national implications of the congressional district electoral vote scheme.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]