Redistricting
Deadline
The
state legislative deadline is December 1, 2001. |
Who�s in Charge of
Redistricting?
The legislature. Usually the executive board of the legislative
council will form a special redistricting committee to report
out a committee bill. Preparations have not yet been made for
the 2000 round of redistricting. The governor has veto power
over the legislature�s plan.
|
Districting
Principles
Principle
|
Congressional
|
State
Legis.
|
Compactness
|
|
+
|
Contiguity
|
|
+
|
Political subdivisions
|
|
+
|
Communities of interest
|
|
|
Cores of prior districts
|
|
|
Protect incumbents
|
|
|
VRA � 5
|
|
+
|
+ =
required
- = prohibited |
Public Access
The
special redistricting committee usually holds hearings in
the capital although they are not required by statute.
Limited hearings are also held in the southwest and northern
central portions of the state where large numbers of Native
Americans reside. The legislature plans to use the Internet
for public information purposes, but as of August 2000 has
not made concrete plans.
|
Political Landscape
The South Dakota legislature has a
short session -- 40 days long -- that ended before the census
figures were released in 2001. Thus, a special session will be called to
consider the redistricting committee�s proposed legislative district
plan. A common point of contention between Democrats and the
Republicans who control the legislature is the use of multimember
house districts. Multimember districts are not required by statute
or the state constitution, but have been in place for a long time.
Democrats strongly oppose them and usually offer their own district
plan composed of single-member districts.
South Dakota
will continue to have only one at-large U.S. House seat. |
Legal Issues
In
March of 2000, the U.S. Department of Justice filed suit
against the state of South Dakota, which had eliminated two
single-member state house districts with Native American
majorities. Generally, house legislative districts in South
Dakota are multi-member, with two representatives running
at-large in each district. The state had converted the Native
American single-member districts back into two-seat districts
in the wake of the Miller v. Johnson ruling, which had
limited the use of
race in drawing district lines. The Department of Justice challenge
has not been decided as of August 2000. |