Redistricting
Deadline
The pool of 25 candiates for the
Commission must be ready by January 8 or each redistricting year. The
Commission aims to meet a deadline of August 1 in 2001. |
Who�s in Charge of
Redistricting?
The Arizona Independent
Redistricting Commission, created by Proposition 106, which amended
the Arizona Constitution to allow a five member commission of
balanced appointments to redraw Arizona's Congressional and
Legislative Districts. The Independent Redistricting Commission is
charged with redrawing fair, competitive districts based on criteria
set forth in Proposition 106. The new districts must also comply
with Sections 2 and 5 of the Voting Rights Act and follow
traditional redistricting principles including compactness, contiguity, and respect for existing boundaries such as cities,
geographic features, and "communities of interest". |
Districting
Principles
Principle |
Congressional |
State
Legis. |
Compactness |
+ |
+ |
Contiguity |
+ |
+ |
Political sub. |
|
|
Communities |
|
|
District cores |
|
|
Incumbents |
|
|
VRA � 5 |
+ |
+ | +
= required
-- = prohibited a
= allowed |
Public Access
Meetings of the Redistricting Commission are
open to the public and a schedule
of the most recent meetings is available online. In addition there are several ways citizens can
influence the Commission, including via email, at the
meetings, or online. The Redistricting Commission has
made drafts of
the preliminary maps available online. The Arizona Republic has
made a .pdf
file of the map available online
as
well
|
Political Landscape
A fast-growing
state, Arizona has gained one congressional district in each of
the past four redistricting cycles, and in 2001 it gained two
more. Republicans currently hold a five-one edge in seats, after
holding a four-one edge for much of the 1980s. From 1993 to 1995,
Democrats held three seats, however, and with the state trending
more Democratic in recent federal elections, redistricting in 2001 could be
particularly significant.
The state legislature consists of
30 districts, each with one state senator and two state house
members. During the last round of redistricting, party control of
the state legislature was split between Democrats and Republicans.
However, party control has less influence now; since new
districts are now drawn by the Arizona Independent Redistricting
Commission. The Speaker of the House makes
one appointment to the Commission, followed by the minority leader
in the House, the president of the Senate, and the minority
leader of the Senate, the fifth member
is not affiliated with a political party and is selected
by the other four members. |
Legal Issues
In 1992, the
Republican-controlled state house and the Democratic state senate
deadlocked on two separate congressional plans. The Republican group
sued in U.S. district court, which instead upheld a third party
intervenor's plan. (The senate plan was rejected because it took
remedial measures to create a Latino-minority district when there
was insufficient evidence that the Latino population met the
criteria established in Thornburg v. Gingles required for such a
plan. In the absence of Voting Rights Act requirements, the court
stated that neutral criteria should be followed. The third party
plan was selected because it adhered best to the neutral districting
principles of compactness, contiguity, serving communities of
interest, and protection of incumbents. The district court's
judgment was later affirmed by the Supreme Court in 1993.
An action was also filed in U.S. district court
requesting the court to redistrict the state legislative districts
because the legislature had failed to do so. The suit was stayed and
later dismissed after the legislature enacted and successfully
precleared a plan after several attempts. |
Legislation/Reform
Efforts
State affiliates of Common Cause and the League of Women
Voters were among several civic groups that formed Fair
Districts and Fair Elections (www.fairdistricts.org). The coalition collected more
than 200,000 signatures to place a measure on the
November 2000 ballot that established an independent citizen commissio which must
draw more compact districts, governed by non-political factors.
The campaign received editorial support from the state�s major newspapers. The measure
was put on the ballot as Proposition 106 and passed 56-44 in
2000.
|
|