|
|
Arkansas� Political Lineup
|
1991 |
2001 |
Governor |
D |
R |
State
Senate |
31D,
4R |
27D,
8R |
State
House |
88D, 11R, 1I |
70D,
30R |
US
Senators |
2D |
1D,
1R |
US
Reps |
3D,
1R |
1R,
3D | |
Redistricting
Deadline
The year following reception of
information from
the Census is the legislative
deadline. There is no congressional deadline. The target date is October
1,
2001. |
Who�s in Charge of
Redistricting?
Congressional districting is
handled by the state agencies and governmental affairs committees of
the house and senate in the General Assembly. The Board of
Apportionment handles legislative redistricting. This board consists
of the Governor, who is chair, the Secretary of State and the
Attorney General of Arkansas. The governor has veto power over the
congressional plan only.
|
Districting
Principles
Principle |
Congressional |
State
Legis. |
Compactness |
|
|
Contiguity |
|
|
Political sub. |
+ |
+ |
Communities |
|
|
District cores |
+ |
+ |
Incumbents |
+ |
+ |
VRA � 5 |
|
| +
= required
-- = prohibited
a = allowed |
Public Access
The Board of Apportionment held hearings around the state from
November to December of 2000. Congressional districts were
considered in committee meetings held at the state capital and open
to the public. The Board has a website,
with maps, a schedule of
hearings, and an area for citizens to make
comments
. The Secretary of
State�s office is also likely
to post the Board of Apportionment�s new map on its
website. |
Political Landscape
In 1991, with Democrats in full control
of redistricting and holding three of the state�s four U.S.
House seats, there were only minor boundary changes done in order to
meet equal population standards. In 2001, Arkansas� legislature
remains heavily Democratic and has sole responsibility for
congressional redistricting. They likely will try to boost
Democrats� chances of winning four House seats in 2002. |
Legal Issues
A minority vote dilution challenge under section 2 of
the Voting Rights Act was lodged against the Arkansas congressional
district plan after the 1990 census. The suit failed. In 1992 and
1993, three suits were filed against the state legislative plan.
The first suit challenged the use of multi-member
districts (there are two remaining multi-seat districts) and was
dismissed by the court as not being unconstitutional per se. The
other two actions were section 2 claims of vote dilution, both of
which failed. |
Legislation/Reform
Efforts
Redistricting has been fairly noncontroversial because county lines
generally have been respected. Senate Joint Resolution 4 would have
required the apportionment of the state into 99 state districts and
33 state senate districts, but the legislation died in a Senate
committee in 1999. |
|
Irregularly Shaped
District District 2 |
|
� 81% white; 18% black; 1% Asian; 1%
Hispanic
� Includes Little Rock
� Democratic incumbent
� Has the state�s highest median income, along with significant
black, union, and university populations
|
Contact Information
Marty Garrity Bureau of Legislative Research State Capitol,
Room 315 Little Rock, AR 72201 501/682-1937
501/682-1936 Fax [email protected] |
For more information:
National Committee for an Effective Congress' Redistricting
Resource: Arkansas -Overview -Detailed
analysis, including new congressional map
EMILY's List Congressional Redistricting Report: Arkansas -Overview -Arkansas
Redistricting Chronicle
Glossary
Redistricting
Provisions 2000
|