Everyone's vote should be equal when electing the president, no matter where they live. FairVote is a leader in the campaign to establish a national popular vote for president, and recommends that political parties establish a schedule and rules to promote all states having a meaningful vote in nomination contests.


Innovative Plan to Win Popular Election of the President Launched
Press conference for National Popular VoteOn February 23, FairVote’s chairman John Anderson joined Sen. Birch Bayh (D-IN), Rep. John Buchanan (R-AL) and other supporters of an important new campaign to elect the president by a national popular vote.

National Popular Vote, backed by FairVote, Common Cause and a bipartisan group of former Members of Congress, presented at the National Press Club an innovative plan for states representing a majority of Americans to join together in an agreement to collectively award their electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote. States have exclusive power over how to allocate electors. FairVote also released an impressive, ground-breaking new report:Presidential Elections Inequality. Copies are available online and for purchase.

[ Learn more at National Popular Vote’s website ]
[ Sen. Birch Bayh on C-Span’s Washington Journal ]
[ New Yorker commentary on the plan ]
[ FairVote op-ed from Sacramento Bee ]
[ FairVote’s new report: Presidential Elections Inequality ]


California Democrats Endorse the American Plan
Biggest state in the nation gives clarion call for a voice in presidential primaries
California FlagThe Democratic Party of California formally endorsed a plan aimed at more voters having influence in the choice of their party's presidential candidate. The American Plan, which was the only alternaitve explicitly mentioned in the DNC's Commission on Presidential Nomination Timing and Scheduling 2005 report, has been steadily gathering enthusiasm in California where grassroots supporters have been attracting attention to the plan one county committee after another. The state party's decision to back the plan is the first state party to take this bold step, though the Young Democrats of America endorsed the American Plan in 2005.

Unlike our current front-loaded primary schedule, the American Plan combines random order with increasing state size to yield a schedule that gives many more people the chance to play a meaningful role in choosing presidential nominees. FairVote was the first national organization to endorse the plan and has helped boost it with writing and outreach.

[ About American Plan ]
[ FairVote oped in the Manchester Times Union ]


DNC Commission on Presidential Nomination Takes Half Step in the Right Direction
American Plan Will be Examined Down the Road
DNC CommissionPresidential nomination reformers were given a little reason to celebrate this holiday season.  On Saturday December 10th, the DNC commission on presidential nomination timing and scheduling met for it’s final meeting to approve the report it will submit to the full DNC next spring.

For 2008 they suggest the mild step of including two to four extra states in the pre-window now used by just Iowa and New Hampshire.  This is a victory for many who correctly note these two northern states fail to represent the diverse nature of the American population.  Still, the reality is we are likely to have the nomination locked up by early February 2008.

The most promising section of the report looks ahead to 2012.  Members unanimously agreed the schedule should be pushed later into the year and drawn out rather than truncated.  To this end the commission agreed their party should consider a comprehensive change for 2012 and specifically suggests examining the American Plan, the primary reform proposal endorsed by FairVote.

[more about the American Plan]


FairVote Releases New Report
Campaign Spending Analysis Underscores Need for Electoral College Reform
FairVote releases a new report Who Picks the President, which chronicles the distribution of television ad spending and political candidate visits during the height of the 2004 presidential election. The report finds further evidence that a vast gulf has developed between a handful of swing states that are zealously courted by major political campaigns, and the rest of the country, which is effectively shut out of the process.

[Read the full text of the report]


[ Previous ] [ Next ]  


Fuzzy Math Report

Presidential Elections Inequality Report
August 10th 2009
Commentary: A cure for the political nomination process
Cleveland Plain Dealer

FairVote's Rob Richie and Paul Fidalgo offer a way to give everyone a say in presidential nominations while retaining the valuable state-by-state evaluation process. This piece also ran in McClatchy's newswire.

July 13th 2009
Albatross of U.S. democracy
Indianapolis Star

FairVote research is cited in support of the National Popular Vote plan in Indiana, because "every vote cast for president should be equally important and equally coveted, whether it originates in California, Connecticut or Crawfordsville."

July 9th 2009
Winner-take-all can elect a second-place president
San Diego Union-Tribune

The founder of National Popular Vote lays out the shortcomings and injustices of the Electoral College system, and shows why the National Popular Vote plan is the right solution.

May 17th 2009
Why states should adopt the National Popular Vote plan for president
San Diego Union-Tribune

FairVote's Rob Richie writes that the Electoral College deepens political inequality, and explains why the National Popular Vote plan is our best opportunity to ensure that every vote for president is equally valued.

May 14th 2009
Let's Make Every Vote Count
The Nation

Katrina vanden Heuvel, editor of the Nation magazine, highlights FairVote's research in an important piece on the "broad support" growing in the states for the National Popular Vote plan to elect the president.