For immediate release
Asian American Action Fund (aaa-fund.org)
Feb. 16, 2007
Contact: Gautam Dutta, Esq. (202.236.2048)

AAA-Fund Endorses National Popular Vote for Presidential Elections

Historic reform will promote national unity and empower Asian Americans

WASHINGTON, DC - The Asian American Action Fund has joined a national movement to reform the process of electing the next President. If this historic reform is adopted, the winner of the national popular vote will automatically win the White House � and votes from California, Texas, Hawaii, and New York will finally matter in Presidential elections.

"The AAA-Fund strongly supports the National Popular Vote," said Erika Moritsugu, AAA-Fund Executive Director. "This ingenious reform will strengthen our democracy, while empowering the Asian American community," she added.

To win the White House, a candidate must win a majority of the Electoral College. In 2000, George W. Bush lost the national popular vote, but nevertheless seized Florida and the Electoral College. In 2004, if John Kerry had received 60,000 more votes in Ohio, he too would have won the Electoral College (despite losing the national popular vote).

Currently, 48 states and the District of Columbia have chosen to send all of their electoral votes to whoever wins their state. For example, if a candidate wins 51% of California's popular vote, he or she will receive 100% of California's electoral votes.

As a result, Presidential nominees only campaign in a handful of hotly contested "Swing States" like New Hampshire, Florida, or Ohio � excluding the 85% of Asian Americans who live elsewhere. Equally unsettling, the Electoral College outcomes of 2000 and 2004 were each decided by a single Swing State, amid serious allegations of theft, voter intimidation, and fraud.

"Unfortunately, our country has been carved up into two unequal groups: a shrinking number of Swing States whose votes are pursued, and a growing number of Spectator States whose votes are taken for granted," explained Gautam Dutta, AAA-Fund National Endorsements Chair.

"By doing away with this divisive system, the National Popular Vote will ensure that everyone's vote for President will count, no matter where he or she lives," Dutta noted.

Under the Constitution, every state has the power to allot its electoral votes as it sees fit. By adopting the National Popular Vote, each state promises to award all of its electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote. Significantly, this promise will only become binding on one condition: that states adding up to an Electoral College majority (270 of 538 electoral votes) have also made the same promise.

Thus, the National Popular Vote guarantees that the winner of the national popular vote will automatically win the Electoral College � and the keys to the White House. Already this year, the Hawaii and Colorado State Senates have passed the National Popular Vote. More details on the National Popular Vote may be found at NationalPopularVote.com or Fairvote.org.

"We look forward to working with our national network to make the National Popular Vote the law of the land," said Dutta.

The AAA-Fund is a national Democratic political organization whose goal is to increase the voice of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders (AAPIs) in local, state and federal government, by encouraging AAPIs to volunteer on campaigns, raise money for candidates, and run for political office.

 
January 1st 2001
The time is ripe for real electoral reform. Why not try democracy in America?
The Hightower Lowdown

Major article about electoral reform with sections advocating instant runoff voting and proportional representation

December 17th 2000
Prof. Guinier writes on Florida and Proportional Representation
San Jose Mercury News

2000 presidential elections revealed the problem of american democracy, which can be solved in various way, one of them being proportional voting.

December 8th 2000
Formula for a Fair Count
Grist

The plurality voting in US violates basic rules of fair and democratic elections, when despite receiving more of the popular vote, the candidate still loses.

December 4th 2000
The Nation Covers Electoral Reform
The Nation

After the 2000 election, The Nation runs several articles criticizing poor voting technology, the Electoral College, the two-party system, and single-member districts.

November 16th 2000
Stand and be counted
Baltimore Sun

Presidential elections in 2000 were the great opportunity for Center and Democracy to take the message about instant runoff voting (IRS) to the general public.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]