Majority rule and genuine voter choice are marks of a functioning democracy. To support voter choice in high turnout elections, we act to encourage understanding, adoption and effective implementation of instant runoff voting, a ranked choice voting system used in a growing number of American elections.


Runoff's Could be Replaced by IRV
ballot from k.novoselic article A new article by FairVote board member Krist Novoselic examines the recent election of a new Washington State Democratic Party Chairperson.  Three candidates were vying for the position, Jean Brooks, Dwight Pelz, and Laura Ruderman.  The party used a traditional system of runoffs as the first vote did not result in a majority winner. 

Mr. Novoselic examines the vote and concludes that the second runoff vote could have been avoided had the party used IRV.  This simple change in procedure could have saved time and effort as votes for Brooks would have been distributed to the other two candidates, based on their second choices, after the first round elimination.  In this election, IRV would have determined the majority winner quickly and without the need for additional voting. 

[ Read Krist Novoselic's article here ]


Burlington IRV Race Heats Up
With the entry of a Progressive candidate into the mayor's race, and a City Councilor weighing an independent bid, IRV looks on track to be put to the test in Burlington, Vermont.

The election in March will be the first time in Vermont that an elected official will be chosen by IRV, which allows voters to rank candidates in order of first, second, third, fourth and more choices, rather than vote for just one. The decision to use IRV won by a landslide margin on a ballot question in March of last year.

IRV is supported by former Vermont Governor Howard Dean as well as independent Congressman and former Burlington mayor Bernie Sanders, and nationally by such figures as John McCain and Barak Obama.

[ FairVote's IRV in Vermont page ]
[ Learn who else supports IRV ]
[ Read a recent oped by Bill McKibben on IRV in Vermont ]


Charter Commission in Hopkins, Minnesota unanimously recommends IRV
Hopkins parkOn November 15th, a charter review commission in Hopkins, Minnesota unanimously recommended that the charter be amended to use IRV for city elections. The recommendation is now set to come before the City Council in January 2006. A public hearing will be held as part of the council's deliberations.

In the first half of the 20th century, Hopkins was one of close to two-dozen cities that used the ranked choice method of proportional voting and may soon join a growing list of cities that have adopted majority voting systems, like San Francisco (CA), Burlington (VT), and Takoma Park (MD).

[ FairVote Minnesota ]
[ IRV in your state ]


[ Previous ] [ Next ]  


IRV Action Kit Minibanner

Recent Articles
October 30th 2009
Don Fraser and George Latimer: The case for instant-runoff voting is clear
Star Tribune

Two former politicians tell St. Paul voters that IRV is "vitally important to us as citizens and as members of our communities."

October 29th 2009
Plurality voting rule is the real election spoiler
Baltimore Sun

In the midst of 3-way races in NJ and NY, FairVote board member and 1980 presidential candidate John Anderson makes the case for IRV over our flawed plurality system.

October 25th 2009
CHARTER AMENDMENT 3: County voters would lose power
The News Tribune

Amendment 3 to the Pierce county charter is an attempt by incumbent politicians to rig the system and prevent any serious challengers from competing. IRV is simply too fair and too democratic to not keep using in our electoral system.

October 22nd 2009
St. Paul should join IRV bandwagon
Star Tribune

Star Tribune stands behind IRV voting. They believe that if this system is used in St. Paul, it will show the state of Missouri that IRV can work and can better represent the voters in the state.