For immediate release
Asian American Action Fund (aaa-fund.org)
Feb. 16, 2007
Contact: Gautam Dutta, Esq. (202.236.2048)

AAA-Fund Endorses National Popular Vote for Presidential Elections

Historic reform will promote national unity and empower Asian Americans

WASHINGTON, DC - The Asian American Action Fund has joined a national movement to reform the process of electing the next President. If this historic reform is adopted, the winner of the national popular vote will automatically win the White House � and votes from California, Texas, Hawaii, and New York will finally matter in Presidential elections.

"The AAA-Fund strongly supports the National Popular Vote," said Erika Moritsugu, AAA-Fund Executive Director. "This ingenious reform will strengthen our democracy, while empowering the Asian American community," she added.

To win the White House, a candidate must win a majority of the Electoral College. In 2000, George W. Bush lost the national popular vote, but nevertheless seized Florida and the Electoral College. In 2004, if John Kerry had received 60,000 more votes in Ohio, he too would have won the Electoral College (despite losing the national popular vote).

Currently, 48 states and the District of Columbia have chosen to send all of their electoral votes to whoever wins their state. For example, if a candidate wins 51% of California's popular vote, he or she will receive 100% of California's electoral votes.

As a result, Presidential nominees only campaign in a handful of hotly contested "Swing States" like New Hampshire, Florida, or Ohio � excluding the 85% of Asian Americans who live elsewhere. Equally unsettling, the Electoral College outcomes of 2000 and 2004 were each decided by a single Swing State, amid serious allegations of theft, voter intimidation, and fraud.

"Unfortunately, our country has been carved up into two unequal groups: a shrinking number of Swing States whose votes are pursued, and a growing number of Spectator States whose votes are taken for granted," explained Gautam Dutta, AAA-Fund National Endorsements Chair.

"By doing away with this divisive system, the National Popular Vote will ensure that everyone's vote for President will count, no matter where he or she lives," Dutta noted.

Under the Constitution, every state has the power to allot its electoral votes as it sees fit. By adopting the National Popular Vote, each state promises to award all of its electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote. Significantly, this promise will only become binding on one condition: that states adding up to an Electoral College majority (270 of 538 electoral votes) have also made the same promise.

Thus, the National Popular Vote guarantees that the winner of the national popular vote will automatically win the Electoral College � and the keys to the White House. Already this year, the Hawaii and Colorado State Senates have passed the National Popular Vote. More details on the National Popular Vote may be found at NationalPopularVote.com or Fairvote.org.

"We look forward to working with our national network to make the National Popular Vote the law of the land," said Dutta.

The AAA-Fund is a national Democratic political organization whose goal is to increase the voice of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders (AAPIs) in local, state and federal government, by encouraging AAPIs to volunteer on campaigns, raise money for candidates, and run for political office.

 
March 14th 2002
Just because majority of voters hate you, it doesn't mean you can't win
Daily Herald

John Anderson is cited with his description of instant runoff voting (IRV), which would introduce majority voting and improve democracy.

August 20th 2001
Hard-won voting rights always in peril
San Francisco Examiner

We must break from the two-party system, institute proportional representation, implement instant runoff voting (IRV), and begin direct election of the President in order to truly level the playing field for minorities and women.

July 12th 2001
Preventing the next Florida fiasco
Daily Texan

The Daily Texan discusses the massive benefits brought by instant-runoff voting to an electoral system.

March 12th 2001
Reclaiming Democracy
The American Prospect

NYU law professor Burt Neuborne discusses a wide range of reforms, including calls for serious consideration of instant runoff voting and proportional voting methods

January 24th 2001
Meddling with Reform/A Clear Majority Winner in 2000
TomPaine.com

Rob Richie proposes instant runoff voting and proportional allocation of electoral votes at a time when national popular election of the president seems unlikely; John Anderson offers IRV as a remedy to the spoiler effect.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]