2008 Campaign Tracker
Following is a listing of the times the major party nominees for president and vice president visited each state from September 5, the day after the Republican presidential convention, to November 4. This information was compiled from the Washington Post and is based on publicly available information from media reports, campaigns, and other sources. Some events--particularly fundraisers--may not be included in the data, as they are often unannounced.Visits to states not included in the chart include Sarah Palin's two visits to her home state of Alaska, Joe Biden's four visits to his home state of Delaware, and the visits by each candidate corresponding to the debates in Mississippi, Missouri, Tennessee, and New York.

Press Release Series: The Swing States of America

        
  12/4/08 - 2008's Shrinking Battleground
10/29/08 - 99% of 2008 Presidential Campaign Visits in Only 17 States

10/22/08 - With two weeks to go, presidential candidates spoil six lucky states

10/17/08 - In the "Swing States of America," Candidates Ignore a Majority of States and Follow Voting Patterns of 2004 Presidential Election

10/9/08 - Candidates Focus Their Times and Resources on a Handful of States and Follow Voting Patterns of 2004 Presidential Election

2008 Presidential Ad Spending
State Obama 
Biden  
Democrat 

McCain 
Palin  
Republican 

All Visits*
Alabama 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Alaska 0 0 0
0 0
0

0
Arizona 0 0 0
2
0 2

2
Arkansas 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
California 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Colorado 5
3
8

5
4
9

17
Connecticut 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Delaware 0 0
0

0 0 0
0
District of Columbia 0 1 1
0 0 0
1
Florida 12
5
17

8
5
13

30
Georgia 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Hawaii 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Idaho 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Illinois 1
0 1

0 0 0
1
Indiana 4
2
6

1
3
4

10
Iowa 1
0 1

4
3
7

8
Kansas 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Kentucky 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Louisiana 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Maine 0 0 0
0 1
1

1
Maryland 0 1
1

0 0 0
1
Massachusetts 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Michigan 3 2 5
4 3 7
12
Minnesota 0 0 0
1
0
1

1
Mississippi 0
0 0

0
0 0

0
Missouri 3
5
8

4
4
8

16
Montana 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Nebraska 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Nevada 4
1
5

1
3
4

9
New Hampshire 3
3
6

2
1
3

9
New Jersey 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
New Mexico 2
1
3

5
1
6

9
New York 3
1 4

4
2
6

10
North Carolina 5
3
8

2
3
5

13
North Dakota 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Ohio 6
9
15

9
11
20

35
Oklahoma 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Oregon 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Pennsylvania 4
5
9

11
9
20

29
Rhode Island 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
South Carolina 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
South Dakota 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Tennessee 0
0 0

1
0 1

1
Texas 0 1
1

0 0 0
1
Utah 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Vermont 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Virginia 9
6
15

3
3
6

21
Washington 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
West Virginia 0 1
1

0 0 0
1
Wisconsin 2 0 2
5
4
9

11
Wyoming 0 0 0
0 0 0
0
Total







           249

*Information in this chart is based on data from The Washington Post 2008 Campaign Tracker. Visits and fundraisers documented in alternative news sources may not be included. Any portion of a day spent in a state constitutes a visit to that state. For example, if a candidate spends one day in Alabama and has two rallies on that day, this is documented as a single visit to Alabama. Multiple events held in one state on the same day are considered a single visit. Consecutive days spent in a single state are considered multiple visits. For example, if a candidate holds a rally on Monday and holds a speech on Tuesday, both in Alabama, each day constitutes its own visit, and the candidate therefore has two visits to Alabama. For the purposes of our research non-traditional campaign events such as fundraisers, visits to candidates' home states, schedule debates, and work-related visits are excluded from the data.
 
February 27th 2006
Group Presses States to Team Up Against Electoral College
Congressional Quarterly

An article that summarizes the recent kickoff of FairVote's National Popular Vote campaign.

February 12th 2006
The Youth Vote
L.A. Times

FairVote's Chris Pearson argues that one reason for low voter turnout among young people is the two-tiered system of battleground and spectator states.

February 12th 2006
Electoral Vote Fosters Neglect of Most States by Candidates
The Mercury News

FairVote Chair John Anderson, shows how the Electoral College neglects a large majority of voters in this most important of elections.

January 1st 2006
Presidential elections all but ignore Illinois
Chicago Tribune

FairVote Chair John Anderson on the harmful impact of the Electoral College.

November 30th 2005
Presidential races don't value state, group says
Aberdeen News

FairVote's Who Picks the President? report sparks discussion about primary reform

[ Previous ] [ Next ]