IRV Editorials
February 24th 2004Preferential Voting Offers More Choice to Voters
Daily Californian
Berkeley considers adopting instant runoff voting in an effort to save money.February 14th 2004
Opinion - In Our View: 1, 2, 3 Voting
Vancouver ColumbianJanuary 2nd 2004
Runoff Vote System Makes Good Sense
The News-Press (FL)
Southwest Florida should consider a new system for counting votes that could eliminate runoffs and just possibly encourage a better brand of politicsJune 10th 2003
Preserve voters' choice
Palm Beach PostMay 12th 2003
Lack of majority in Mayoral Race
The Electronic Courier
The Electronic Courier provides details on the shortcomings of plurality voting systems and the need to use instant runoff voting.April 16th 2003
Making IRV reality
San Francisco Bay Guardian
Election officials in San Francisco are urged to carry out the first instant runoff voting (IRV) election to the highest standards to ensure the system is embraced nationwide.April 13th 2003
Choice Voting is fairer way for Seattle to elect City Council
Janet Anderson writes an editorial encouraging support for instant runoff voting in Seattle, WA.March 29th 2003
Instant runoff voting: Win-win reform gathers steam
The Progressive PopulistMarch 22nd 2003
In Our View: A Better Ballot?
Vancouver Columbian
Vancouver, WA awaits the Senate's vote on allowing cities to try out instant runoff voting.February 10th 2003
Right ballot move
Fresno Bee
Instant runoff voting is recommended in Fresno to increase voter turnout and election efficiency.January 16th 2003
Editorial Runoff voting system would improve UCSD
The UCSD Guardian
Editorial advocating instant runoff voting for student government elections.December 18th 2002
The case for runoffs
St. Petersburg Times
This editorial extols the potential of instant runoff voting (IRV) to take over the function of the suspended runoff elections in Florida and ensure majorian victories and moderate candidates.[ Previous ] [ Next ]