HCA 33
Background and Procedural Information

On January 9, 2008 Illinois General Assemblyperson Patricia Lindner introduced Illinois House Constitutional Amendment 33 (IL H.C.A. 33).  As of June 4, 2008 it has not moved forward to a committee.  IL H.C.A. 33 would replace the Legislative Redistricting Commission with a computer program.   

Under the proposed legislation, are single-member districts a requirement or otherwise implied?

Yes.  Under the proposed amendment single-member districts are required.  

Does the proposed legislation provide for Voting Rights Act compliance (e.g. can the commission use voter history information)?

The computer program would be required to not use political affiliation of voters, previous election results, and “Demographic information not required to be used by this section or by the United States constitutional or federal law.”

Under the proposed legislation, how is the commission formed?

The Illinois Board of Elections will designate a computer program to redistrict the each body of the Illinois legislature by April 15 of years ending in one.  The Illinois Senate and General Assembly each have the ability to bypass the Board of Elections and choose the computer program that would redistrict their legislative body if they choose a program by June 15 in years ending in one.  A three-fifths yea vote is required to approve any software program.
 
Under the proposed legislation, are competitive districts favored?

No.  There are five criteria that the computer program may use, but crafting competitive districts is not one of the criterions.  

Under the proposed legislation, can members of the public submit plans?

No.  Members of the public may not submit a proposed computer program to the Board of Elections or the Legislature.  

Does the proposed legislation allow for mid-decade redistricting?

No.  The program may only be used in years ending in one.  

 
November 3rd 2002
Politics, Incumbency Style
Newsday

Columnist Rosanna Perotti discusses proportional representation as a solution to monopoly politics.

November 3rd 2002
Get your election results here: 99.8% accurate
Houston Chronicle

FairVote's Steven Hill and Rob Richie describe that the election results can be predicted in US, because most districts tilt strongly toward one party.

November 2nd 2002
Why state has few real races for House
San Jose Mercury News

FairVote's Larry Sabato comments on the lack of competitive House seats in the 2002 election, noting that San Jose residents have a better chance of affecting the race by donating money to a candidate in another part of the country than voting.

October 30th 2002
More than ever, incumbents in driver's seat
USA Today

Despite the fact redistricting is suppose to boost competition, this article explores how drawing congressional district lines has rendered 90% of elections nearly uncontested, drawing examples from Illinois.

October 28th 2002
GOP House members snug in incumbency
Cincinnati Enquirer

Money, incumbency advantage, and redistricting have transformed the American political system into a non-competitive arena.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]