Governor addresses Legislature vote

By Ross Sneyd
Published October 6th 2002 in Associated Press

Excerpt:

'The governor said his preferred change would be to institute "instant runoff voting." Under that system, voters would rank their choices for governor in order and tabulators would use those rankings to determine who had the most support of Vermonters.'

Full Article:

Gov. Howard Dean jumped into the fray Friday over how his successor should be elected, calling on legislators to tell voters how they'll vote if the race is thrown into the Legislature.

Dean said he thinks voters would be angry if a candidate who won the most votes Election Day weren't elected governor or lieutenant governor by a joint session of the House and Senate.

There is that prospect because the Vermont Constitution gives the Legislature the responsibility for choosing a governor if no candidate wins more than 50 percent of the popular vote.

"I'll call on every legislative candidate to pledge they'll reveal their ballot," Dean said. "I think we're owed that as Vermonters."

There is a good possibility that lawmakers will have to determine the races for governor and lieutenant governor because there are three prominent candidates in each race.

The most recent polls show that none of them has support of anything close to 50 percent of the voters.

Dean faced the prospect of his own election's being thrown to the Legislature in 2000 when he ran against Republican Ruth Dwyer and Progressive Anthony Pollina.

That November he did urge just above the 50 percent threshold and was elected outright.

Even before the election, he was urging the Legislature to begin the process of amending the Constitution because he argued then that the state probably would face this question in statewide elections for years because the state offers public funding to gubernatorial and lieutenant gubernatorial candidates.

That makes it more likely to have a viable, multi-candidate field in the general election and less likely any of them would win a majority.

"I went to the Government Operations Committee in the Senate at that time and I asked for a constitutional amendment," Dean said.

The governor said his preferred change would be to institute "instant runoff voting." Under that system, voters would rank their choices for governor in order and tabulators would use those rankings to determine who had the most support of Vermonters.

The outgoing administration is making plans for the possibility that the state won't know who its new governor will be until Dean's last day in office.

The administration is writing a budget that the new governor can use as a blueprint for his own spending plan. Dean also has talked to some agency secretaries and department commissioners about staying on the job past next year's inauguration to ensure a smooth transition.

IRV Soars in Twin Cities, FairVote Corrects the Pundits on Meaning of Election Night '09
Election Day '09 was a roller-coaster for election reformers.  Instant runoff voting had a great night in Minnesota, where St. Paul voters chose to implement IRV for its city elections, and Minneapolis voters used IRV for the first time—with local media touting it as a big success. As the Star-Tribune noted in endorsing IRV for St. Paul, Tuesday’s elections give the Twin Cities a chance to show the whole state of Minnesota the benefits of adopting IRV. There were disappointments in Lowell and Pierce County too, but high-profile multi-candidate races in New Jersey and New York keep policymakers focused on ways to reform elections;  the Baltimore Sun and Miami Herald were among many newspapers publishing commentary from FairVote board member and former presidential candidate John Anderson on how IRV can mitigate the problems of plurality elections.

And as pundits try to make hay out of the national implications of Tuesday’s gubernatorial elections, Rob Richie in the Huffington Post concludes that the gubernatorial elections have little bearing on federal elections.

Links