Bill paves way for voting-reform referendum60% support required to alter Ontario system
By Robert Benzie
Published October 25th 2006
It will take "a solid majority" of at least 60 per cent of voters to change Ontario's electoral system if a referendum is held next year on proposed reforms, says Democratic Renewal Minister Marie Bountrogianni.
Bountrogianni yesterday tabled legislation that would allow a question on electoral reform to be part of the Oct. 4, 2007, ballot if a citizens' panel studying the issue recommends that.
"This is historic legislation. A decision to change electoral systems should not be taken lightly," she said.
A Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform will announce by May 15 whether the first-past-the-post electoral system needs to be reformed to allow proportional representation or some other model.
If the 103-member assembly recommends changes, a referendum question would be added to the ballot next year.
For the changes to be adopted, at least 60 per cent support is required. Reforms would have to be endorsed by more than 50 per cent of the ballots cast in 64 of the 107 ridings being contested in the 2007 election. Critics lambasted the Liberal government for following in B.C. Premier Gordon Campbell's controversial footsteps. Campbell set a 60 per cent threshold for reform in a May 2005 referendum, but change was supported by 57 per cent of British Columbians, so he was shamed into promising another vote for 2009.
"We have a government that is setting a standard that has failed in British Columbia, that was greeted with cynicism in British Columbia, that was discredited in British Columbia," said NDP MPP Michael Prue (Beaches-East York).
Larry Gordon, executive director of Fair Vote Canada, said it was "ironic" that a bill devoted to democratic reform would be so undemocratic and warned of political problems for Premier Dalton McGuinty.
Election Day '09 was a roller-coaster for election reformers. Instant runoff voting had a great night in Minnesota, where St. Paul voters chose to implement IRV for its city elections, and Minneapolis voters used IRV for the first time—with local media touting it as a big success. As the Star-Tribune noted in endorsing IRV for St. Paul, Tuesday’s elections give the Twin Cities a chance to show the whole state of Minnesota the benefits of adopting IRV. There were disappointments in Lowell and Pierce County too, but high-profile multi-candidate races in New Jersey and New York keep policymakers focused on ways to reform elections; the Baltimore Sun and Miami Herald were among many newspapers publishing commentary from FairVote board member and former presidential candidate John Anderson on how IRV can mitigate the problems of plurality elections.