By Ron Capshaw
Published January 20th 2003 in Scott County Virginia Star
A state legislator wants to remove any doubt over who has the majority support of voters when more than two candidates are on the ballot.
Under Delegate William Barlow's unusual solution, voters
would get to mark not only their first choice but also a second choice
on Election Day. If no one gets more than 50 percent of the
first-choice votes, election officials
then would look at the second-choice votes -- thus creating what Barlow calls an "instant runoff."
"Jesse Ventura won the governorship by getting only 1 out of 3 votes," he said. That's not a good way to vote."
In 1998, Ventura, running as an independent, won the Minnesota governor's race with 37 percent of the vote. The Republican candidate got 35 percent and the Democratic nominee 28 percent. Or, Barlow said, consider the 2000 presidential race.
Nationwide, Republican George W. Bush received 48 percent of the vote, and Democrat Al Gore 48.3 percent. Most of the remaining votes went to Ralph Nader of the Green Party. In several states, because of Nader, no one got more than half of the popular vote.
Barlow, a Democrat from Smithfield, believes his instant-runoff system will not only provide a conclusive winner quickly but also restore voter interest in the process. "People lose interest when there is a runoff," he said.
"Runoffs are expensive and take 10 days. With my bill people can vote for a first and second choice. "If, for instance, I had been a Nader voter in the last presidential election, I could have voted for Nader first and Gore second. A clear victory might not have been in doubt. With my bill, someone can emerge with 51 percent of the vote."
If the General Assembly approves his proposal, Virginia would become one of the first states to adopt an instant-runoff system, Barlow said."Some other countries are already doing this." If the bill doesn't pass this year, it will eventually, Barlow said. "Instant runoff is going to happen soon." He also is sponsoring a bill to revamp the redistricting process.
Every 10 years, after the census, the General Assembly redraws legislative districts. Typically, whichever party is in control tries to draws the lines to its political advantage. "It's partisan, whether its Democrats doing it or Republicans," Barlow said.
"Citizens are getting
increasingly unhappy with this process." His solution: Have an
independent, nonpartisan commission redraw the political maps. "The
main questions are, who will appoint the commission members and then
who will these members appoint?"
Barlow offers his
answer to those questions with a proposed constitutional amendment
creating the Virginia Redistricting Commission. The commission would
have 11 members -- one from each of Virginia's congressional districts.
The panel would be appointed by the most recently retired chief justice
of the Virginia Supreme Court.
The former justice, in turn, would select other retired judges as commission members. "They retired, so they aren't beholden to the governor or the Assembly or anyone," Barlow said. "They would have to abide by the law, though."
The commission members would be selected on the basis of geography, integrity and race, although race should not be a predominant factor, Barlow said.
Election Day '09 was a roller-coaster for election reformers. Instant runoff voting had a great night in Minnesota, where St. Paul voters chose to implement IRV for its city elections, and Minneapolis voters used IRV for the first time—with local media touting it as a big success. As the Star-Tribune noted in endorsing IRV for St. Paul, Tuesday’s elections give the Twin Cities a chance to show the whole state of Minnesota the benefits of adopting IRV. There were disappointments in Lowell and Pierce County too, but high-profile multi-candidate races in New Jersey and New York keep policymakers focused on ways to reform elections; the Baltimore Sun and Miami Herald were among many newspapers publishing commentary from FairVote board member and former presidential candidate John Anderson on how IRV can mitigate the problems of plurality elections.