SB 243
Background and Procedural Information

On January 9, 2008 Virginia Democratic Senator Janet Howell introduced Virginia Senate Bill 243 (VA S.B. 243).  As of June 11, 2008 the bill is currently stalled in a Virginia Senate Committee.  This bill would organize a seven-person commission that would be responsible for redistricting the Virginia General Assembly and congressional seats.   

Under the proposed legislation, are single-member districts a requirement or otherwise implied?

No.  Single-member districts are neither required nor implied.   

Does the proposed legislation provide for Voting Rights Act compliance (e.g. can the commission use voter history information)?

Yes.  The bill makes compliance with the Voting Rights Act one of the seven criteria that the commission must follow.  The Commission may not use voter history information.

Under the proposed legislation, how is the commission formed?

The President Pro Tem of the Senate, the House Speaker, the Senate Minority Leader, the House Minority Leader, the Chairpersons of the political parties receiving the most and second most votes in the most recent gubernatorial election will each appoint one member of the commission.  These six commissioners will then appoint, by a vote of at least four members, a final commissioner who will also serve as chairman.  The chairman may not have served in a political office for the last five years.  The General Assembly has ultimate authority to determine the district boundaries.  The commission merely presents plans and recommendations.
 
Under the proposed legislation, are competitive districts favored?

No.  Although the commission must use seven criteria in creating districts, forging competitive districts is not a priority.   

Under the proposed legislation, can members of the public submit plans?

No.  Members of the public may appear at a series of open forums where they can give comments and ask questions, but they cannot give submit maps or plans.   

Does the proposed legislation allow for mid-decade redistricting?

No.  There are no provisions that allow for mid-decade redistricting.   
   
November 3rd 2002
Politics, Incumbency Style
Newsday

Columnist Rosanna Perotti discusses proportional representation as a solution to monopoly politics.

November 3rd 2002
Get your election results here: 99.8% accurate
Houston Chronicle

FairVote's Steven Hill and Rob Richie describe that the election results can be predicted in US, because most districts tilt strongly toward one party.

November 2nd 2002
Why state has few real races for House
San Jose Mercury News

FairVote's Larry Sabato comments on the lack of competitive House seats in the 2002 election, noting that San Jose residents have a better chance of affecting the race by donating money to a candidate in another part of the country than voting.

October 30th 2002
More than ever, incumbents in driver's seat
USA Today

Despite the fact redistricting is suppose to boost competition, this article explores how drawing congressional district lines has rendered 90% of elections nearly uncontested, drawing examples from Illinois.

October 28th 2002
GOP House members snug in incumbency
Cincinnati Enquirer

Money, incumbency advantage, and redistricting have transformed the American political system into a non-competitive arena.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]