Student Voting
Political apathy and subsequent low voter turnout of youth (18-29) is often cited as fact. Many decry their political disengagement and apparent laziness, but recent election cycles have presented a very different and much more troubling reason for why many youth do not vote.

Across the country, students reported that they were subjected to increased scrutiny, unequal treatment, and at times outright harassment when they attempted to register to vote or cast a ballot on Election Day. Such acts of voter intimidation and suppression are particularly distressing because most of the targeted individuals are registering to vote for the first time and are unfamiliar with election laws.

Despite the fact that every college student is entitled to register to vote at the residence he or she considers "home," including a campus residence, many college communities actively prevent college students from registering to vote where they attend school. Students around the country have faced difficulty registering to vote because of local officials. In the case of historically African-American Prairie View A&M in Texas, the District Attorney publicly stated that if students attempted to register to vote they would be prosecuted for voter fraud.

Common tactics used to dissuade students from registering to vote include:
  • Misinformation - telling college students they cannot register where they attend school or that if they register to vote at school they could be in jeopardy of losing financial aid, or that they are only able to vote where their parents pay taxes
  • Residency requirement legislation - The New Hampshire legislature passed a law after the 2000 presidential election that required newly registered voters to register their car and obtain a New Hampshire driver's license within 60 days or face criminal prosecution
Not only do students face challenges when trying to register to vote, but they also face challenges on Election Day.  In some instances, poll watchers have challenged students who are registered to vote by asking them to sign an affidavit affirming their citizenship and that they will only vote once. Long lines plagued many college campus polling places during the 2004, 2006 and 2008 election cycles.

Although students are not traditionally considered a targeted demographic for voter suppression, it is clear that they, too, face many hurdles when attempting to register and vote.

 
Articles on Student Voting
April 24th 2008
Pickard prevails in TCU presidential election
The Tufts Daily

Another successful election using IRV at Tufts University.

April 22nd 2008
Of Grunge and Voting
The Washington Post

Jeffrey Birnbaum of the Washington Post on Krist Novoselic's new role at FairVote.

April 22nd 2008
State Officials Asked To Probe Flaws In Voter Lists
The Hartford Courant

The Hartford Courant reports, Secretary of the State Susan Bysiewicz asked state election officials to investigate the failure to purge the dead from voter roll

April 21st 2008
Instant runoffs worth the time and effort
Amarillo Globe News

Texas� April 8th runoff election experienced a dramatic decline in voter turnout from the March 4th initial round, Rob Richie explains why this huge turnout decrease makes the case for IRV.

April 21st 2008
Plurality Voting Problematic for Columbia
The Columbia Spectator

An article explaining why Instant Runoff Voting could revitalize student democracy for student government elections at Columbia University.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]