December 4th 2000
The Nation Covers Electoral Reform
The Nation

After the 2000 election, The Nation runs several articles criticizing poor voting technology, the Electoral College, the two-party system, and single-member districts.

December 1st 2000
Reclaiming Democracy in the 21st Century
Social Policy

Rob Richie, Steven Hill, and Caleb Kleppner discuss the benefits of instant runoff voting and proportional representation, as well as how it is used internationally

November 23rd 2000
Instant Runoff Voting-We Like It!: Australians do it, Londoners do it, why can't we?
Hartford Advocate

The author describes instant runoff voting (IRV), that is now gathering interest in Vermont, New Mexico and Alaska, as a remedy for the lack of majority in the elections.

November 22nd 2000
Taking Back the Vote: Florida Fiasco Puts Radical Reforms on the Table
Village Voice

FairVote's Eric Olson speaks about the necessity of streamlining the voting process so "every vote counts," as this article offers alternatives to our first-past-the-post system.

November 22nd 2000
Voter Futures
Sacramento News and Review

November 21st 2000
Group Pushes Election 'Instant Runoff' Idea
Los Angeles Times

Public Interest Research Group, an organization founded by Ralph Nader, promotes the idea of instant runoff voting (IRV).

November 17th 2000
America's election confusion means it may be a 'Windows Millennium' after all
Infoworld.com

The United States needs to modernize its elections and the voting system because they invite suspicion of fraud.

November 17th 2000
INSTANT RUNOFFS WILL END 'LOSER-TAKES-ALL':
Lansing State Journal

Instant runoff voting (IRV) is the way to avoid expensive runoffs, spoiler problem and would promote positive campaigns.

November 16th 2000
Stand and be counted
Baltimore Sun

Presidential elections in 2000 were the great opportunity for Center and Democracy to take the message about instant runoff voting (IRS) to the general public.

November 16th 2000
Recent elections have made instant runoff voting look intriguing
Minneapolis Star-Tribune

This Star Tribune writer thinks the spoiler effect has become a much more serious problem since Alan Shilepsky made instant runoff voting (IRV) the center of his 1998 campaign and now advocates Minnesota take a closer look at the system.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]

IRV Soars in Twin Cities, FairVote Corrects the Pundits on Meaning of Election Night '09
Election Day '09 was a roller-coaster for election reformers.  Instant runoff voting had a great night in Minnesota, where St. Paul voters chose to implement IRV for its city elections, and Minneapolis voters used IRV for the first time—with local media touting it as a big success. As the Star-Tribune noted in endorsing IRV for St. Paul, Tuesday’s elections give the Twin Cities a chance to show the whole state of Minnesota the benefits of adopting IRV. There were disappointments in Lowell and Pierce County too, but high-profile multi-candidate races in New Jersey and New York keep policymakers focused on ways to reform elections;  the Baltimore Sun and Miami Herald were among many newspapers publishing commentary from FairVote board member and former presidential candidate John Anderson on how IRV can mitigate the problems of plurality elections.

And as pundits try to make hay out of the national implications of Tuesday’s gubernatorial elections, Rob Richie in the Huffington Post concludes that the gubernatorial elections have little bearing on federal elections.

Links