January 30th 2001
Let's Simplify Voting
New York Times

Commentary advocating instant runoff voting and proportional representation.

January 30th 2001
Let's Simplify Voting

Electronic voting machines are susceptible to tampering and are very complex argues Andrew Humm in support of verifiable paper trails.

January 24th 2001
REVITALIZING THE CREAKING EDIFICE OF U.S. DEMOCRACY
TomPaine.com

Instant runoff voting is posed as the remedy for the spoiler effect of third parties in the wake of the 2000 presidential election.

January 24th 2001
Meddling with Reform/A Clear Majority Winner in 2000
TomPaine.com

Rob Richie proposes instant runoff voting and proportional allocation of electoral votes at a time when national popular election of the president seems unlikely; John Anderson offers IRV as a remedy to the spoiler effect.

January 24th 2001
THE MOST NEEDED ELECTORAL REFORM
TomPaine.com

Amy claims that the creation of proportional representation is the most needed reform in American politics because it will raise voter turnout and representation; FairVote is cited as creating pragmatic plans for implementing PR.

January 23rd 2001
New weight for voting rights
Capital Times

Article about Rep. McKinney and voting rights.

January 11th 2001
Can We Keep Diverse Voice In Our Civic Dialog?
Charlotte Observer

An article advocating the use of cumulative voting, instant runoff voting, and limited voting to represent an increasingly diverse electorate.

January 10th 2001
The Future of Voting
St. Petersburg Times

Possible alternatives to the punch card voting system used in Florida are offered, includng the optically scanned ballot and touch screen computers.

January 9th 2001
A BETTER WAY OF VOTING
The State (Charleston, South Carolina)

South Carolina Senator John Matthews has proposed cumulative voting and multi-member districts to address the problem that racially uniform districts may produce racially divided legislatures.

January 3rd 2001
Emancipation and Enfranchisement
Asian Week

Discusses proportional representation and instant runoff voting as well as other electoral reforms

[ Previous ] [ Next ]

IRV Soars in Twin Cities, FairVote Corrects the Pundits on Meaning of Election Night '09
Election Day '09 was a roller-coaster for election reformers.  Instant runoff voting had a great night in Minnesota, where St. Paul voters chose to implement IRV for its city elections, and Minneapolis voters used IRV for the first time—with local media touting it as a big success. As the Star-Tribune noted in endorsing IRV for St. Paul, Tuesday’s elections give the Twin Cities a chance to show the whole state of Minnesota the benefits of adopting IRV. There were disappointments in Lowell and Pierce County too, but high-profile multi-candidate races in New Jersey and New York keep policymakers focused on ways to reform elections;  the Baltimore Sun and Miami Herald were among many newspapers publishing commentary from FairVote board member and former presidential candidate John Anderson on how IRV can mitigate the problems of plurality elections.

And as pundits try to make hay out of the national implications of Tuesday’s gubernatorial elections, Rob Richie in the Huffington Post concludes that the gubernatorial elections have little bearing on federal elections.

Links