July 9th 2001
Illinois should return to cumulative voting;
University of Illinois Institute of Government and Public Affairs

July 8th 2001
New legislature reform push
Chicago Tribune

FairVote's Dan Johnson-Weinberger comments on the recent effort by reformers in Illinois to defeat a 1980s piece of legislation that ended "cumulative voting," in favor of a Cutback Amendment.

July 8th 2001
A vote for cumulative voting
Springfield Journal-Register

A new report put out by the Illinois Task Force on political Representation and Alternative Electoral Systems suggests a return to cumulative voting in Illinois might heighten voter turnout, create more competitive elections, and lower campaign expen

July 8th 2001
Letter to the editor
The New London Day

Connecticut needs to implement an instant runoff voting (IRV) system in order to have every vote count equally in each election argues David Brensilver.

July 5th 2001
Instant runoff: A voting method worthy of debate
Minneapolis Star Tribune

Instant runoff voting (IRV) may be taking form in the upcoming Minneapolis city election to help with the rise of serious third-party candidates.

July 5th 2001
Try Changing the County Charter
The Monterey County Herald

Redistricting is allowing representatives to elect their voters; therefore, to eliminate this problem, proportional representation needs to be implemented argues Nat S. Lerner.

July 2nd 2001
One man, 7 votes?

FairVote's Rob Richie argues that cumulative voting can increase the representation of minorities if implemented in Baldwin County (AL).

June 21st 2001
An Alternative for Norfolk City Council Elections
The Virginian-Pilot

Multi-member districts are recommended as redistricting plans may further disenfranchise black voters in Norfolk, Virginia.

June 19th 2001
Remuddling the House Needed: smaller districts and no 'safe seats'
Christian Science Monitor

The editorial discusses the redistricting that will occur following the 2000 census, noting ways in which the public may ensure a fair and decent process.

June 13th 2001
Runoff voting would save time, money
The Eugene Register-Guard

[ Previous ] [ Next ]

IRV Soars in Twin Cities, FairVote Corrects the Pundits on Meaning of Election Night '09
Election Day '09 was a roller-coaster for election reformers.  Instant runoff voting had a great night in Minnesota, where St. Paul voters chose to implement IRV for its city elections, and Minneapolis voters used IRV for the first time—with local media touting it as a big success. As the Star-Tribune noted in endorsing IRV for St. Paul, Tuesday’s elections give the Twin Cities a chance to show the whole state of Minnesota the benefits of adopting IRV. There were disappointments in Lowell and Pierce County too, but high-profile multi-candidate races in New Jersey and New York keep policymakers focused on ways to reform elections;  the Baltimore Sun and Miami Herald were among many newspapers publishing commentary from FairVote board member and former presidential candidate John Anderson on how IRV can mitigate the problems of plurality elections.

And as pundits try to make hay out of the national implications of Tuesday’s gubernatorial elections, Rob Richie in the Huffington Post concludes that the gubernatorial elections have little bearing on federal elections.

Links