Student Voting
Political apathy and subsequent low voter turnout of youth (18-29) is often cited as fact. Many decry their political disengagement and apparent laziness, but recent election cycles have presented a very different and much more troubling reason for why many youth do not vote.

Across the country, students reported that they were subjected to increased scrutiny, unequal treatment, and at times outright harassment when they attempted to register to vote or cast a ballot on Election Day. Such acts of voter intimidation and suppression are particularly distressing because most of the targeted individuals are registering to vote for the first time and are unfamiliar with election laws.

Despite the fact that every college student is entitled to register to vote at the residence he or she considers "home," including a campus residence, many college communities actively prevent college students from registering to vote where they attend school. Students around the country have faced difficulty registering to vote because of local officials. In the case of historically African-American Prairie View A&M in Texas, the District Attorney publicly stated that if students attempted to register to vote they would be prosecuted for voter fraud.

Common tactics used to dissuade students from registering to vote include:
  • Misinformation - telling college students they cannot register where they attend school or that if they register to vote at school they could be in jeopardy of losing financial aid, or that they are only able to vote where their parents pay taxes
  • Residency requirement legislation - The New Hampshire legislature passed a law after the 2000 presidential election that required newly registered voters to register their car and obtain a New Hampshire driver's license within 60 days or face criminal prosecution
Not only do students face challenges when trying to register to vote, but they also face challenges on Election Day.  In some instances, poll watchers have challenged students who are registered to vote by asking them to sign an affidavit affirming their citizenship and that they will only vote once. Long lines plagued many college campus polling places during the 2004, 2006 and 2008 election cycles.

Although students are not traditionally considered a targeted demographic for voter suppression, it is clear that they, too, face many hurdles when attempting to register and vote.

 
Articles on Student Voting
February 16th 2006
Act Locally With Instant Runoff Voting
The Minnesota Daily

A letter to the editor advocating for IRV in Minnesota and explaining what IRV is and how it works.

February 16th 2006
Zuckerman Bows Out of House Race; Criticizes Voting By Fear
Burlington Free Press

Progressive state representative David Zuckerman drops out of the VT U.S. House race to avoid plitting votes among Democrats and Progressives.

February 13th 2006
Ranked Choice Voting in SF: $3 Million Saved, Turnout Nearly Tripled
BeyondChron: San Francisco's Alternative Online Daily News

The introduction of RCV to SF saved the city 3 million dollars by eliminating the extra cost of the December runoffs. Also, it nearly tripled voter participation in the decicive round of runoffs. Most SF voters now prefer the new system to the old

February 12th 2006
Let's take city elections out of hands of very few
Houston Chronicle

Op-Ed that advocates IRV for Houston city elections arguing that runoffs give the final decision to a very small number of voters. References recent success in San Francisco.

February 12th 2006
Electoral Vote Fosters Neglect of Most States by Candidates
The Mercury News

FairVote Chair John Anderson, shows how the Electoral College neglects a large majority of voters in this most important of elections.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]