Student Voting
Political apathy and subsequent low voter turnout of youth (18-29) is often cited as fact. Many decry their political disengagement and apparent laziness, but recent election cycles have presented a very different and much more troubling reason for why many youth do not vote.

Across the country, students reported that they were subjected to increased scrutiny, unequal treatment, and at times outright harassment when they attempted to register to vote or cast a ballot on Election Day. Such acts of voter intimidation and suppression are particularly distressing because most of the targeted individuals are registering to vote for the first time and are unfamiliar with election laws.

Despite the fact that every college student is entitled to register to vote at the residence he or she considers "home," including a campus residence, many college communities actively prevent college students from registering to vote where they attend school. Students around the country have faced difficulty registering to vote because of local officials. In the case of historically African-American Prairie View A&M in Texas, the District Attorney publicly stated that if students attempted to register to vote they would be prosecuted for voter fraud.

Common tactics used to dissuade students from registering to vote include:
  • Misinformation - telling college students they cannot register where they attend school or that if they register to vote at school they could be in jeopardy of losing financial aid, or that they are only able to vote where their parents pay taxes
  • Residency requirement legislation - The New Hampshire legislature passed a law after the 2000 presidential election that required newly registered voters to register their car and obtain a New Hampshire driver's license within 60 days or face criminal prosecution
Not only do students face challenges when trying to register to vote, but they also face challenges on Election Day.  In some instances, poll watchers have challenged students who are registered to vote by asking them to sign an affidavit affirming their citizenship and that they will only vote once. Long lines plagued many college campus polling places during the 2004, 2006 and 2008 election cycles.

Although students are not traditionally considered a targeted demographic for voter suppression, it is clear that they, too, face many hurdles when attempting to register and vote.

 
Articles on Student Voting
July 25th 2006
Another idea
Courier Post On-line

Letter to the editor totes instant runoff voting as a means to address the "spoiler" effect of third party candidates.

July 24th 2006
Two elections, one trip to vote
Wilmington Star News

Editorial board of Wilmington Star News comes out in strong favor of using instant runoff voting for future North Carolina elections.

July 24th 2006
Every vote counts in a fair electoral system
The Orange County Register

Representative Tom Umberg (D) responds to critics of the national popular vote and labels it a far better system than the current one.

July 24th 2006
Stanford professor stumps for electoral alternative
San Francisco Chronicle

FrontPage article provides a biography of national popular vote campaign founder John Koza.

July 24th 2006
Long-Shot Candidates May Harm Cardin
Washington Post

Political analysts describe what they call "the Nader effect" of outsider "spoiler" candidates in the Democratic primary for U.S. Senate in Maryland this year. Instant runoff voting would be an obvious solution.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]