Boards should be chosen by single transferable vote system

By John A. O'Brien
Published November 20th 2003 in The Colonial

Democrats sweep Whitemarsh election.

GOP Holds control of Colonial Board

These were the front page headlines from your issue of November 6-12, 2003. As a Democrat, I should be pleased with the former result and displeased with the latter (especially in view of the fact that my wife was one of the Democratic candidates.)

However, my real problem with the results last Tuesday, and indeed with the results of most elections, is the fact that the rules under which elections for such bodies as school boards and boards of supervisors are conducted usually lead to all of the winners being from the same political party.

These boards are supposed to represent ALL of the people of the community. Then why not elect them by a single transferable vote (a/k/a ranked choice) system, such as that used in Cambridge, Massachusetts and in the Republic of Ireland?

This system, which differs from the at-large plurality system used now in that it requires the voter to rank the candidates in order of preference, would make elections more interesting , giving anyone with a substantial amount of support in the community a chance to win, regardless of party.  This would lead to higher voter turnout, more participation at the candidate level, and more representative governing bodies.

Sincerely,
John A. O'Brien