Cumulative vote set for 2nd actTurnout is key to making it work
So far, so good on Amarillo's experiment with something called "cumulative voting."
The public school district's second chapter on the new voting plan commences May 4 with the election of three Amarillo Independent School District trustees.
The success of the voting plan likely will rest in the voter turnout. Let us hope it grows - and keeps growing.
AISD voters in 2000 elected the first Hispanic woman to the board, Rita Sandoval, as well as the first African-American, James Allen. Even better news was that these two candidates brought significant qualifications to the campaign and have served the district ably during the past two years.
Cumulative voting was the result of a lawsuit brought against AISD by civil rights groups contending that the district's former at-large election system discriminated against minority candidates. School trustees approved the cumulative voting plan as a way to end the lawsuit.
The voting plan approved by the school board allows voters to cast more than one vote for a candidate. The maximum number of votes a single candidate can receive is equal to the number of seats being contested in a given election. This year, with three seats being decided, one candidate can receive as many as three votes.
The idea of cumulative voting is to enfranchise voters who contended they were disenfranchised by a system they perceived as being stacked against them - and their political interests.
The old system worked well for AISD. The new system can work just as well.
Here, though, is the catch: For the cumulative voting system to work as its proponents intend, minority voters have to turn out. The 2000 election brought mixed results in predominantly minority neighborhoods. Indeed, Sandoval and Allen won their seats on the strength of voter turnout in mostly Anglo precincts of southwest Amarillo.
Cumulative voting remains a work in progress. Board members approved the settlement in 1999 with some trepidation, fearing that it might prompt single-issue zealots to seek a place at the seat of power. So far, that hasn't happened.
For this new system to fulfill its promise, eligible voters need to register - and then turn out to vote.
If they choose to forgo that fundamental right of citizenship, they in effect relinquish any right to complain later.
Election Day '09 was a roller-coaster for election reformers. Instant runoff voting had a great night in Minnesota, where St. Paul voters chose to implement IRV for its city elections, and Minneapolis voters used IRV for the first time—with local media touting it as a big success. As the Star-Tribune noted in endorsing IRV for St. Paul, Tuesday’s elections give the Twin Cities a chance to show the whole state of Minnesota the benefits of adopting IRV. There were disappointments in Lowell and Pierce County too, but high-profile multi-candidate races in New Jersey and New York keep policymakers focused on ways to reform elections; the Baltimore Sun and Miami Herald were among many newspapers publishing commentary from FairVote board member and former presidential candidate John Anderson on how IRV can mitigate the problems of plurality elections.