By Rob Richie
Published October 29th 1999
To the Wall Street Journal editors,
You contend that the fact that the U.S. Presidency is elected through the Electoral College rather than direct election "requires any third party candidate to approach a majority of the popular vote" (editorial, October 27, 1999).
Hogwash! More than a third of presidential elections have been won with a mere plurality of the popular vote, including four winners with less than 44% of the vote. Abraham Lincoln won a convincing Electoral College victory as a third party candidate with less than 40% of the vote. Bill Clinton won more than two-thirds of the electoral college vote in 1992 with only 43% of the vote.
The fact remains that the Presidency is the only office of any significance in the nation where a candidate can win with fewer votes than an opponent. With a steady rise in minor party and independent candidacies at a state and federal level, it's time once again to consider replacing the Electoral College with direct election. To assure a real majority winner, a much better solution than a simple plurality vote or keeping the Electoral College would be to adopt instant runoff voting, a majority vote system used to elect the Australian parliament, president of Ireland and, next year, mayor of London.
LIST OF PLURALITY PRESIDENTS
Year Winner Popular Vote Electoral Vote
1996 Clinton 49.2% 70%
1992 Clinton 43.0% 69%
1968 Nixon 43.4% 56%
1960 Kennedy 49.7% 56%
1948 Truman 49.5% 57%
1916 Wilson 49.3% 52%
1912 Wilson 41.8% 82%
1892 Cleveland 46.0% 62%
1888 Harrison 47.8% 58%
1884 Cleveland 48.8% 55%
1880 Garfield 48.3% 58%
1876 Hayes 47.9% 50%
1860 Lincoln 39.9% 59%
1856 Buchanan 45.3% 59%
1848 Taylor 47.3% 56%
1844 Polk 49.3% 62%
1824 Adams 29.8% 32%
Rob Richie is executive director of The Center for Voting and Democracy
You contend that the fact that the U.S. Presidency is elected through the Electoral College rather than direct election "requires any third party candidate to approach a majority of the popular vote" (editorial, October 27, 1999).
Hogwash! More than a third of presidential elections have been won with a mere plurality of the popular vote, including four winners with less than 44% of the vote. Abraham Lincoln won a convincing Electoral College victory as a third party candidate with less than 40% of the vote. Bill Clinton won more than two-thirds of the electoral college vote in 1992 with only 43% of the vote.
The fact remains that the Presidency is the only office of any significance in the nation where a candidate can win with fewer votes than an opponent. With a steady rise in minor party and independent candidacies at a state and federal level, it's time once again to consider replacing the Electoral College with direct election. To assure a real majority winner, a much better solution than a simple plurality vote or keeping the Electoral College would be to adopt instant runoff voting, a majority vote system used to elect the Australian parliament, president of Ireland and, next year, mayor of London.
LIST OF PLURALITY PRESIDENTS
Year Winner Popular Vote Electoral Vote
1996 Clinton 49.2% 70%
1992 Clinton 43.0% 69%
1968 Nixon 43.4% 56%
1960 Kennedy 49.7% 56%
1948 Truman 49.5% 57%
1916 Wilson 49.3% 52%
1912 Wilson 41.8% 82%
1892 Cleveland 46.0% 62%
1888 Harrison 47.8% 58%
1884 Cleveland 48.8% 55%
1880 Garfield 48.3% 58%
1876 Hayes 47.9% 50%
1860 Lincoln 39.9% 59%
1856 Buchanan 45.3% 59%
1848 Taylor 47.3% 56%
1844 Polk 49.3% 62%
1824 Adams 29.8% 32%
Rob Richie is executive director of The Center for Voting and Democracy
Election Day '09 was a roller-coaster for election reformers. Instant runoff voting had a great night in Minnesota, where St. Paul voters chose to implement IRV for its city elections, and Minneapolis voters used IRV for the first time—with local media touting it as a big success. As the Star-Tribune noted in endorsing IRV for St. Paul, Tuesday’s elections give the Twin Cities a chance to show the whole state of Minnesota the benefits of adopting IRV. There were disappointments in Lowell and Pierce County too, but high-profile multi-candidate races in New Jersey and New York keep policymakers focused on ways to reform elections; the Baltimore Sun and Miami Herald were among many newspapers publishing commentary from FairVote board member and former presidential candidate John Anderson on how IRV can mitigate the problems of plurality elections.