Better Voting?
Published August 26th 2002 in Common Sense series
When they count the votes in Alaska, most of us on the East Coast will have long since gone to bed. But tomorrow night, you might want to stay up late. Alaska could be setting a national trend, becoming the first state to change the way it votes. It's not some new anti-chad machine, it's Ballot Measure One on Instant Runoff Voting, which Alaska could be the first state to adopt. Instant Runoff Voting allows the voter to specify not only his first choice, but also his second, and, depending on the number of candidates, a third and fourth choice. This way, if the leading candidate fails to get a majority, a runoff vote happens automatically. The runoff works by dropping the last place candidate and then reallocating his votes to the voter's next preference. The process is repeated until one candidate wins a true majority. The voting system we have now only helps to entrench incumbent politicians. Typically, voters must choose between the lesser of two evils. With the reform of Ballot Measure One, voters can choose their favorite candidate without the risk that they'll throw the election to the worst candidate. No more fear of a wasted vote, when you want to vote your conscience. And Instant Runoff Voting saves money. Not having to hold a separate runoff election -- an election that almost always has abysmal turnout anyway -- saves oodles of tax dollars. I like that. If the pioneering spirit survives in Alaska, They'll pass this reform and show the whole country a new way of empowering voters. The vote is August 27, tomorrow . . . stay tuned. This is Common Sense. I'm Paul Jacob.

IRV Soars in Twin Cities, FairVote Corrects the Pundits on Meaning of Election Night '09
Election Day '09 was a roller-coaster for election reformers.  Instant runoff voting had a great night in Minnesota, where St. Paul voters chose to implement IRV for its city elections, and Minneapolis voters used IRV for the first time—with local media touting it as a big success. As the Star-Tribune noted in endorsing IRV for St. Paul, Tuesday’s elections give the Twin Cities a chance to show the whole state of Minnesota the benefits of adopting IRV. There were disappointments in Lowell and Pierce County too, but high-profile multi-candidate races in New Jersey and New York keep policymakers focused on ways to reform elections;  the Baltimore Sun and Miami Herald were among many newspapers publishing commentary from FairVote board member and former presidential candidate John Anderson on how IRV can mitigate the problems of plurality elections.

And as pundits try to make hay out of the national implications of Tuesday’s gubernatorial elections, Rob Richie in the Huffington Post concludes that the gubernatorial elections have little bearing on federal elections.

Links