Majority rule and genuine voter choice are marks of a functioning democracy. To support voter choice in high turnout elections, we act to encourage understanding, adoption and effective implementation of instant runoff voting, a ranked choice voting system used in a growing number of American elections.


Washington State Allows Clark County to Pursue IRV
New law permits Vancouver to implement years-old voter mandate
Washington state capitolWashington Governor Christine Gregoire this week signed HB 1447, a bill allowing instant runoff voting to be used for a five year pilot project in the cities of Vancouver, Spokane, and Tacoma--the second IRV law to pass this year. Though Vancouver has already passed an IRV-authorizing charter amendment, the city council now must move by 2007 to implement IRV during the trial period to run from 2008-2013. Representative Jim Moeller's years of persistence have paid off: the bill's chief sponsor initially lobbied the Vancouver council to support IRV before becoming a legislator.

[More on Washington's IRV pilot program]


IRV Receives Rave Reviews on Campuses
Dartmouth the most recent to conduct successful election
Dartmouth CollegeDartmouth College held its first instant runoff voting race in April, electing Noah Riner as Student Body President in the sixth round. The elections team put together an online IRV election program within weeks, The Dartmouth newspaper featured IRV voter education prior to the election, and all parties involved had positive reactions. The successful election trails on the heels of recent well-run IRV elections for the Universities of Oklahoma and Virginia, as well as IRV adoptions at Clark University, Lewis & Clark College, and Portland State University.

[Read The Dartmouth's IRV guide]  [More Dartmouth election results]  [More on student elections]


San Jose Mercury News Endorses Full Representation to Solve Gerrymandering Problem
Editorial board also supports IRV for California elections
San JoseAfter convening a panel of redistricting reform experts, the San Jose Mercury News editorial board concluded that if improving elections and the quality of representation is the goal, California needs multimember districts with proportional voting. The paper recognized that an independent redistricting panel would protect minority rights, make districts compact, and not split cities or communities, but ultimately found that it would not go far enough. The Mercury News also endorsed instant runoff voting, citing its recent successful use in San Francisco.

[Read the editorial] [More on multimember districts in CA]


[ Previous ] [ Next ]  


IRV Action Kit Minibanner

Recent Articles
October 30th 2009
Don Fraser and George Latimer: The case for instant-runoff voting is clear
Star Tribune

Two former politicians tell St. Paul voters that IRV is "vitally important to us as citizens and as members of our communities."

October 29th 2009
Plurality voting rule is the real election spoiler
Baltimore Sun

In the midst of 3-way races in NJ and NY, FairVote board member and 1980 presidential candidate John Anderson makes the case for IRV over our flawed plurality system.

October 25th 2009
CHARTER AMENDMENT 3: County voters would lose power
The News Tribune

Amendment 3 to the Pierce county charter is an attempt by incumbent politicians to rig the system and prevent any serious challengers from competing. IRV is simply too fair and too democratic to not keep using in our electoral system.

October 22nd 2009
St. Paul should join IRV bandwagon
Star Tribune

Star Tribune stands behind IRV voting. They believe that if this system is used in St. Paul, it will show the state of Missouri that IRV can work and can better represent the voters in the state.