Majority rule and genuine voter choice are marks of a functioning democracy. To support voter choice in high turnout elections, we act to encourage understanding, adoption and effective implementation of instant runoff voting, a ranked choice voting system used in a growing number of American elections.


Instant Runoff Legislation Easily Passes North Carolina State House
North Carolina counties would use instant runoff voting (IRV) in local elections in 2005-2006 in a pilot project introduced by Rep. Paul Luebke. On May 18 the bill received bipartisan approval in the North Carolina house by a vote of 79-32. Under Rep. Luebke’s proposal, the State Board of Elections would work with up to ten counties interested in participating in the project.  Much of the initiative for improving North Carolina’s runoffs came from problems in the state’s 2004 elections, which had only 3% voter turnout in a statewide runoff that cost more than $3 million of taxpayer funds. North Carolina legislators recognized that IRV could increase voter turnout, reduce the costs of elections, and ensure more broadly supported winners. The bill now heads to the state senate.

[More about the North Carolina IRV bill].


Pennsylvania Election Reform Task Force Suggests IRV and Proportional Voting Studies
Reforms would be relevant to voter turnout
Pennsylvania Governor, Ed Rendell, created the Pennsylvania Election Reform Task Force through Executive Order 2004-11. The bipartisan, 13-member panel focused on a range of issues and reforms designed to increase voter turnout and inspire confidence on the state's electoral system. The Task Force issued its final report to Gov. Rendell on May 12th. Among its conclusions, were the belief that instant runoff voting and proportional representation are relevant and ought to be studied further, as they affect both voter confidence in elections and voter turnout.

[Read the Final Report - .pdf]


IRV Election Equipment Certified
Accupoll machine compatible with instant runoffs
Accupoll, a California-based election equipment vendor, has produced a voting machine that can handle instant runoff elections. The "Version 2.5" system, which provides a voter verified paper audit trail, recently received federal certification. The company proudly proclaims its new ranked choice capabilities, which should make it a viable competitor as more locales move toward IRV elections. FairVote applauds Accupoll for taking initiatives for alternative voting.


[More on the Accupoll system]


[ Previous ] [ Next ]  


IRV Action Kit Minibanner

Recent Articles
October 30th 2009
Don Fraser and George Latimer: The case for instant-runoff voting is clear
Star Tribune

Two former politicians tell St. Paul voters that IRV is "vitally important to us as citizens and as members of our communities."

October 29th 2009
Plurality voting rule is the real election spoiler
Baltimore Sun

In the midst of 3-way races in NJ and NY, FairVote board member and 1980 presidential candidate John Anderson makes the case for IRV over our flawed plurality system.

October 25th 2009
CHARTER AMENDMENT 3: County voters would lose power
The News Tribune

Amendment 3 to the Pierce county charter is an attempt by incumbent politicians to rig the system and prevent any serious challengers from competing. IRV is simply too fair and too democratic to not keep using in our electoral system.

October 22nd 2009
St. Paul should join IRV bandwagon
Star Tribune

Star Tribune stands behind IRV voting. They believe that if this system is used in St. Paul, it will show the state of Missouri that IRV can work and can better represent the voters in the state.