November 15th 2006
Redistricting Reconsidered
Washington Post

Citing FairVote's Dubious Democracy 2006, an editorial notes that non-competition in U.S. House races has causes more fundamental than gerrymandering.

November 15th 2006
Cumulative voting protects minority voice
Vietnam Net Bridge

Shareholder elections in Vietnam now use cumulative voting as a way to protect minority shareholders.

November 15th 2006
IRV's time has come
The Coloradoan

Colorado's recent election could have turned out differently if instant runoff voting had been adopted in Colorado.

November 15th 2006
Next Step: How to Implement Instant Runoff Voting
The Berkeley Daily Planet

As instant runoff voting (IRV) begins to sweep Alameda County, California, officials find ways to standarize and simplify the process.

November 15th 2006
County officials should be up to IRV challenge
Tacoma News Tribune

An editorial argues that the newly elected Pierce Co. (WA) Auditor should have no problem implementing instant runoff voting.

November 14th 2006
Democracy: New way to vote
Seattle Post-Intelligencer

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer editorial staff comments on Pierce County's amendment to introduce Instant Runoff Voting (IRV) for most county offices.

November 14th 2006
Stop blaming Greens for GOP wins
The Detroit News

Douglas Campbell, Vice Chair of the Green Party of Michigan, blames the current electoral system for "spoiled" elections rather than the participation of third parties. He suggests Instant Runoff Voting as a remedy.

November 14th 2006
Hain's PR ban could result in a 'crisis' in Wales
IC Wales

The Welsh Secretary of State has come out against proportional representation (PR)in local elections. Many believe this is a political move, saying that the Labour party supported PR when they were not the majority party.

November 14th 2006
Voters approve Measure L
The California Aggie

Although choice voting has not yet been implemented in Davis, California, the November 7 elections were a crucial first step.

November 14th 2006
Much work ahead for Minneapolis' instant-runoff voting
Star Tribune

Minneapolis voters overwhelmingly supported instant runoff voting (IRV), but implementation will take work.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]

IRV Soars in Twin Cities, FairVote Corrects the Pundits on Meaning of Election Night '09
Election Day '09 was a roller-coaster for election reformers.  Instant runoff voting had a great night in Minnesota, where St. Paul voters chose to implement IRV for its city elections, and Minneapolis voters used IRV for the first time—with local media touting it as a big success. As the Star-Tribune noted in endorsing IRV for St. Paul, Tuesday’s elections give the Twin Cities a chance to show the whole state of Minnesota the benefits of adopting IRV. There were disappointments in Lowell and Pierce County too, but high-profile multi-candidate races in New Jersey and New York keep policymakers focused on ways to reform elections;  the Baltimore Sun and Miami Herald were among many newspapers publishing commentary from FairVote board member and former presidential candidate John Anderson on how IRV can mitigate the problems of plurality elections.

And as pundits try to make hay out of the national implications of Tuesday’s gubernatorial elections, Rob Richie in the Huffington Post concludes that the gubernatorial elections have little bearing on federal elections.

Links