By Sarah Buduson
Published November 2nd 2008 in WREG-TV Memphis
A Shelby County Commissioner is on a crusade to convince voters to change the way elections are held in the city of Memphis.
Commissioner Steve Mulroy has actively campaigned in support of Referendum 5 for the last year. Memphis voters will decide on the ballot issue Tuesday.
Mulroy said, "It's just a great election reform that will save voters' time, save taxpayers a boatload of money and will also increase turnout."
Referendum 5 would change how Memphis voters elect members of the city council. Mulroy said instead of choosing one candidate for a council seat, voters would rank each candidate in order of preference. If no candidate receives 50% or more of the vote, the candidate with the fewest votes would be eliminated. The losing candidate's votes would then be given to the other candidates in the race, based on who was ranked second on those ballots. The process continues until there is a clear winner, preventing the need for a runoff election. Referendum 5 has opponents.
The Commerical Appeal's editorial board recommends voting no on the ballot issue. Even some members of Mulroy's own party, like Shelby County Democratic Party member D. Harris, has problems with the proposal. Harris said, "I just think it's confusing to rank the people you support by some numerical order. This is not baseball. This is not a batting order. This is one man, one vote."
Mulroy said studies have shown voters like and prefer ranking candidates. He says his only concern is voters' fear of change. Mulroy said, "My opponent is just inertia."
Referendum 5 would change how Memphis voters elect members of the city council. Mulroy said instead of choosing one candidate for a council seat, voters would rank each candidate in order of preference. If no candidate receives 50% or more of the vote, the candidate with the fewest votes would be eliminated. The losing candidate's votes would then be given to the other candidates in the race, based on who was ranked second on those ballots. The process continues until there is a clear winner, preventing the need for a runoff election. Referendum 5 has opponents.
The Commerical Appeal's editorial board recommends voting no on the ballot issue. Even some members of Mulroy's own party, like Shelby County Democratic Party member D. Harris, has problems with the proposal. Harris said, "I just think it's confusing to rank the people you support by some numerical order. This is not baseball. This is not a batting order. This is one man, one vote."
Mulroy said studies have shown voters like and prefer ranking candidates. He says his only concern is voters' fear of change. Mulroy said, "My opponent is just inertia."
Election Day '09 was a roller-coaster for election reformers. Instant runoff voting had a great night in Minnesota, where St. Paul voters chose to implement IRV for its city elections, and Minneapolis voters used IRV for the first time—with local media touting it as a big success. As the Star-Tribune noted in endorsing IRV for St. Paul, Tuesday’s elections give the Twin Cities a chance to show the whole state of Minnesota the benefits of adopting IRV. There were disappointments in Lowell and Pierce County too, but high-profile multi-candidate races in New Jersey and New York keep policymakers focused on ways to reform elections; the Baltimore Sun and Miami Herald were among many newspapers publishing commentary from FairVote board member and former presidential candidate John Anderson on how IRV can mitigate the problems of plurality elections.