RNC looks to fix 2012 primariesBy Ralph Z. Hallow
Published April 3rd 2008 in The Washington Times
SANTA ANA, N.M. — Republicans
yesterday took the first step in trying to prevent a front-loaded, de
facto national primary in 2012, but big-state dissent surfaced
immediately to preference given to smaller states.
The Republican National Committee's rules panel yesterday voted 28-12 for a plan that preserves desirable early slots for smaller states, including Iowa and New Hampshire, and rotates "pods" of larger states quadrennially in later slots.
"The impetus for change we made today is the foolishness of state after state competing to get to the head of the line, resulting in most cases in their getting less attention than they would ordinarily get," said Virginia's Rules Committee member, Morton Blackwell.
The "Ohio Plan," which will be considered by the full RNC in August, calls for Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada to hold their contests in mid-February.
Next comes a several-day "window" for 19 other small states to hold contests. The remaining states would then vote by region in three groups, or "pods," in March and April. The three groups would rotate every four years.
Some competing plans to Ohio GOP Chairman Robert Bennett's creation had pointedly eliminated the privileged first-in-the-nation status of Iowa and New Hampshire, arguing that neither is representative of the average Republican voter in America. It also has angered some chairmen from large-population states.
Michigan GOP Chairman Saul Anuzis said his state's influence in determining the GOP's nominee is likely to be minimal at best.
"The plan says our vote will always come after 23 other states and territories, making us probably irrelevant ...," he said.
California GOP Chairman Ron Nehring said he will not support the plan because "the net effect is that large states like California will never be among the first states voting."
With virtually every state wanting to hold its contest early enough to help determine the nominee, the current system was heading toward a national primary, dreaded by most Republicans because it would give insufficient time to vet nomination competitors.
The plan includes a mechanism to ensure Republicans — not Democrats — in control of state legislatures, which often set primary dates, decide their process.
GOP leaders in states with Democrat-controlled legislatures would go along with primary dates lawmakers set and possibly lose half their delegates, but they could hold party-funded conventions or caucuses within the party's schedule to get the remaining delegates seated.
Conventions and caucuses are less expensive than primaries and have the added advantage that only Republicans could participate — no independents or crossover Democrats, as permitted in some state primaries.
A similar plan to slow the trend toward a national primary failed at the 2000 Republican National Convention.
The Republican National Committee's rules panel yesterday voted 28-12 for a plan that preserves desirable early slots for smaller states, including Iowa and New Hampshire, and rotates "pods" of larger states quadrennially in later slots.
"The impetus for change we made today is the foolishness of state after state competing to get to the head of the line, resulting in most cases in their getting less attention than they would ordinarily get," said Virginia's Rules Committee member, Morton Blackwell.
The "Ohio Plan," which will be considered by the full RNC in August, calls for Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada to hold their contests in mid-February.
Next comes a several-day "window" for 19 other small states to hold contests. The remaining states would then vote by region in three groups, or "pods," in March and April. The three groups would rotate every four years.
Some competing plans to Ohio GOP Chairman Robert Bennett's creation had pointedly eliminated the privileged first-in-the-nation status of Iowa and New Hampshire, arguing that neither is representative of the average Republican voter in America. It also has angered some chairmen from large-population states.
Michigan GOP Chairman Saul Anuzis said his state's influence in determining the GOP's nominee is likely to be minimal at best.
"The plan says our vote will always come after 23 other states and territories, making us probably irrelevant ...," he said.
California GOP Chairman Ron Nehring said he will not support the plan because "the net effect is that large states like California will never be among the first states voting."
With virtually every state wanting to hold its contest early enough to help determine the nominee, the current system was heading toward a national primary, dreaded by most Republicans because it would give insufficient time to vet nomination competitors.
The plan includes a mechanism to ensure Republicans — not Democrats — in control of state legislatures, which often set primary dates, decide their process.
GOP leaders in states with Democrat-controlled legislatures would go along with primary dates lawmakers set and possibly lose half their delegates, but they could hold party-funded conventions or caucuses within the party's schedule to get the remaining delegates seated.
Conventions and caucuses are less expensive than primaries and have the added advantage that only Republicans could participate — no independents or crossover Democrats, as permitted in some state primaries.
A similar plan to slow the trend toward a national primary failed at the 2000 Republican National Convention.
Election Day '09 was a roller-coaster for election reformers. Instant runoff voting had a great night in Minnesota, where St. Paul voters chose to implement IRV for its city elections, and Minneapolis voters used IRV for the first time—with local media touting it as a big success. As the Star-Tribune noted in endorsing IRV for St. Paul, Tuesday’s elections give the Twin Cities a chance to show the whole state of Minnesota the benefits of adopting IRV. There were disappointments in Lowell and Pierce County too, but high-profile multi-candidate races in New Jersey and New York keep policymakers focused on ways to reform elections; the Baltimore Sun and Miami Herald were among many newspapers publishing commentary from FairVote board member and former presidential candidate John Anderson on how IRV can mitigate the problems of plurality elections.