Claim Democracy
Claim Democracy encourages networking and collaboration among national, state and local democracy groups in order to build support for and strengthen a national infrastructure for a pro-democracy movement within the United States.  Its most significant accomplishment thus far has been our November 2003 and 2007 Claim Democracy conferences, which brought together representatives of more than 100 organizations and more than 500 people for intensive private meetings and public dialogue inWashington, D.C. In light of recent election administration problems and high-profile obstacles to fair elections in the public interest, its major goal for 2008 is the Democracy SoS (Secretary of State) project, designed to develop a comprehensive agenda for action by Secretaries of State and other elected officials who influence election policy.

The vision for Claim Democracy is to help create and support a network of state-based organizations that work to secure, enhance and exercise the right vote through a range of reforms and activities. Rather than exclusively focus on one particular reform or another, these organizations would be able to coordinate and pool resources to advocate one of a number of reforms that meet clear pro-democracy goals. Examples include: expanding the electorate, increasing citizen participation, providing fair representation, promoting better political debate, freeing voters to support their candidate of choice and supporting equality in the political process. Potential activities include plans to:
  • Establish a new website with a range of information about pro-democracy issues, blogs from several leading pro-democracy advocates and easy means to find pro-democracy advocates in one’s state or locality. An internal invitation-only set of pages would facilitate communication among leaders of pro-democracy groups.

  • Promote creation of and support for a network of state and local groups working to promote participation and reform in their state – ideally seeking to integrate efforts to boost citizen participation with reform efforts and seeking to establish lasting relationships with elected officials able to enact change.

  • Coordinate regular meetings of a pro-democracy roundtable of national and local groups, designed to promote strategic thinking, greater communication and coordination in the pro-democracy movement and support for state/local efforts.

  • Develop a “war-room” communications ability able to spotlight deficits in our democracy and work being done to address those efforts.

  • Develop and work with caucuses of pro-democracy elected officials, at local, state and federal levels – coordinating strategic initiatives that can be carried out at different levels.

  • Develop curriculum about the history of expansion of democracy in the United States as a whole and individual states to be used in K-12 schools.


 
Missouri registers fewer poor to vote

By David Goldstein
Published April 1st 2008 in Kansas City Star
The number of poor registered to vote has fallen sharply in Missouri and elsewhere because states are not doing their job, voter registration advocates said Tuesday.

They told a House hearing that many states’ public assistance offices are not making it easier for their clients to register, as federal law requires.

Voter registration through food stamps, Medicaid and such dropped nearly 80 percent in 10 years — from 2.6 million in 1995-96 to 540,000 in 2005-06, according to a study done by Project Vote and Demos, both nonpartisan and nonprofit.

“All Americans deserve an equal opportunity to register to vote and participate in our democracy,” testified Michael Slater, deputy director of Project Vote. “Many states, however, are undermining that promise and furthering inequalities.”

The study found state election and assistance officials often do not even know about the law, nor have their staffs been trained to carry it out. Many offices also lack proper voter materials.

In Missouri, the study found public assistance registrations sank 89 percent — 143,000 people in 1995-96, but less than 16,000 a decade later.

“We got a lot of people registered in those early years,” said Jandra Carter, special assistant to the director of the Missouri Department of Social Services. “There’s just a kind of natural point where those numbers will start to go down. There’s certainly no attempt to not comply with the law.”

She also said the offices had less “foot traffic” because more services were available online.

Kansas fared better. It registered 8,400 people through public assistance in 1995-96, and 8,100 two years ago.

The hearing was before the Elections Subcommittee of the House Administration Committee, which was considering the success of the 1993 National Voter Registration Act, often called the “motor voter” law. It required states to offer voter sign–ups when people apply for or renew driver’s licenses.

Several states had falloffs as steep as Missouri. In North Carolina, it was 85 percent.

“We had assumed that the agencies’ voter registration was on autopilot and those agencies were doing the job they were supposed to do,” Johnnie McLean, of the North Carolina Board of Elections, told the hearing.

She said state aid workers probably never knew that helping clients register was a federal order and “not just another state agency asking them to do something else in their jobs.”

In 2006, North Carolina asked Demos and Project Vote to help it improve its compliance.

Voter registrations through public assistance agencies rose by 25,000 last year, McLean said.

To reach David Goldstein, call 202-383-6105 or send e-mail to [email protected].