Single Member Districts
The single member plurality election is the most common and best-known electoral system currently in use in America. It is used to elect the U.S. House Representatives, as well as many state and local legislatures. Under single member plurality systems, an area is divided into a number of geographically defined voting districts, each represented by a single elected official. Voters can only vote for their district’s representative, with the highest vote-getter winning election, even if he or she has received less than half of the vote.

In addition to the problems endemic to all winner-take-all systems, single member plurality results create some specific difficulties of their own. First, wherethe boundaries of districts are drawn can have a huge effect on who is likely to win election. As a result, gerrymandering to protect incumbents or weaken political enemies is common under single member plurality systems. Second, single member plurality elections are prone to the spoiler dynamic. Where more than two viable candidates run and split the vote within a district, the “winner” of an election can often be the candidate whom the majority of voters liked least. Generally, parties will limit the number of candidates running to avoid this scenario, leaving voters with minimal choice. These dynamics essentially mean that in the vast majority of single member plurality elections, voters have no effective choice, but to ratify the candidate of the majority party in their district.

Single member majority systemsare identical to single-member plurality systems, except that they use two round runoffs or instant runoff voting to ensure that the winner of an election has the support of the majority of voters. While this eliminates the spoiler problem, it does nothing to stop the negative effects of gerrymandering or the limitations inherent in making geography the primary districting critera. In some cases these systems can also make it harder for communities of color to win election.

August 21st 2005
Electoral system breeds big spenders
The Philadelphia Inquirer

Steven Hill explains how the current winner-take-all electoral system has made the American taxpayer pay.

March 31st 2005
A Good Proposal that Won't do Much
San Jose Mercury News

Newspaper endorses full representation and IRV to solve California's redistricting woes

May 22nd 2004
Revisiting redistricting
The Washington Post

America does not need to be tied down to the single member district system; FairVote's Rob Richie is quoted on the possibility of having three member super districts.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]