ACA 4
Background and Procedural Information

Assemblymembers Mike Villines and Anthony Adams introduced California Assembly Constitutional Amendment 4.  As of June 4, 2008 the proposed amendment is currently stalled in the Assembly.   

Under the proposed legislation, are single-member districts a requirement or otherwise implied?

Single-member districts are a requirement for the California Assembly, Senate, Board of Equalization, and Congress.   

Does the proposed legislation provide for Voting Rights Act compliance (e.g. can the commission use voter history information)?

The proposed commission would only use voter history information only for purposes of complying with the Voting Rights Act.

Under the proposed legislation, how is the commission formed?

The Commission would consist of eleven members.  Four members each would be registered with the largest and second largest political party while three would not be registered with either of those parties.  The Secretary of State would select the eleven acting and alternate commissioners by randomly selecting applicants from a combined active voter list compiled by the election officials from each county in California.  The Secretary of State would ask each potential Commissioner if they would like to serve as commissioner until the twenty-two active and alternate spots were filled.  After the Commission has created its final plan the voters of California must pass it in the same manner as they would a referendum.
 
Under the proposed legislation, are competitive districts favored?

Priorities of the Commission are ranked in level of importance from one to eight.  The eighth priority is for competitive districts.  

Under the proposed legislation, can members of the public submit plans?

Yes.  Members of the public may offer a complete or partial proposed redistricting plan, written comments, or oral testimony.

Does the proposed legislation allow for mid-decade redistricting?

It does not strictly forbid mid-decade redistricting, although there are no provisions for Commission action after it submits the final redistricting plan.  
 
June 18th 2006
Where politicians dare to tread
San Francisco Chronicle

The San Francisco Chronicle editorial board endorses the British Columbia Citizens Assembly approach to electoral reform, specifically noting the potential for proportional representation in California.

March 21st 2006
Real redistricting reform is proportional representation
San Francisco Examiner

Rob Dickinson of Californians for Electoral Reform writes a commentary on how recent proposals to make the redistricting process fairer miss the mark. For real progress in how we elect our representatives, we need to turn to proportional voting.

March 1st 2006
Tanner redistricting bill gains Senate sponsor
The Hill

Senator Tim Johnson introduced a companion bill to Rep. John Tanner's federal redistricting reform legislation. The identical bills, supported by FairVote, would set up state commissions to handle redistricting only once a decade.

December 20th 2005
Overhaul of state electoral system sought

Following on the heels of the defeat of redistricting reform in California, Republican and Democratic legislators plan on introducing legislation to create a citizens assembly for election reform and discuss proportional voting for the state.

December 11th 2005
A Dramatic Idea for Election Reform
New York Times

A Times reader highlights the fundamental weakness of any single-member district-based system: gerrymandering is unavoidable.

[ Previous ] [ Next ]