Majority rule and genuine voter choice are marks of a functioning democracy. To support voter choice in high turnout elections, we act to encourage understanding, adoption and effective implementation of instant runoff voting, a ranked choice voting system used in a growing number of American elections.


Coast to Coast, Instant Runoff Voting Builds Support
Advances in North Carolina and California
CoastOn July 26th, the North Carolina state House passed a bipartisan bill previously passed by the Senate on the 19th, making way for the use of instant runoff voting (IRV) for statewide elections for judicial office vacancies and to let 10 cities and 10 counties try IRV.

On July 18th, the night before H1024 was passed by the state Senate,  the City Council of Oakland (CA) voted 6-2 to place IRV on the November ballot, folding their current two rounds of voting into one high turnout majority election in November. Representing a combined population of more than 1.6 million people, four cities and counties -- Oakland, Davis (CA), Pierce County (WA) and Minneapolis (MN) -- will vote on IRV this November.

Update:  The North Carolina Governor signed the IRV bill on August 3rd; the pilot program is set to begin in 2007-2008.

[FairVote's Press Release on North Carolina]
[AP Article on IRV in North Carolina]
[San Francisco Chronicle on IRV in Oakland]
[Text of the Oakland Bill]
[Text of the North Carolina Bill]


IRV on the Ballot in Pierce County, Washington
A picture of Reiner Tower in Tacoma WashingtonThe Pierce County Charter Review Commission on June 17 approved a measure to add instant runoff voting (IRV) to the ballot for county elections. Appearing on the ballot this November 7th along with a similar measure in Minneapolis (MN), the measure would trigger IRV elections in 2008.

With more than 750,000 people, including the city of Tacoma, Pierce County would join San Francisco as one of the two largest jurisdictions in the nation using IRV. The proposal has a unique twist that would address the problem of low-turnout primaries in states across the nation. Parties would use private means such as conventions or caucuses to nominate one or more candidates for each office, but voters would have a full range of choice among all candidates in one high turnout general election -- avoiding low turnout primaries in August in favor of a spoiler-free, choice-filled majority election in November.

IRV has a history of serious debate in Washington. In 2005, the Washington state legislature passed HB 1447, which empowered various cities to consider a change to IRV.


[ Blog by charter commissioner ]
[ IRV Washington, a pro-IRV group ]
[ News story on the proposed charter changes ]
[ IRV Victories: FairVote’s emerging site designed to boost IRV campaigns ]
[ Testimony to Pierce County Charter Review Commission by FairVote's Caleb Kleppner ]


Majority Rule the Norm in Democracies
Runoff systems dominate free presidential elections
Alan GarciaFairVote on June 7 released its new report Majority Rule in International Presidential Elections: The Dominant Role of Runoffs Around the World. The paper comes on the heels of centre-left candidate Alan Garcia's victory in Peru's presidential runoff. Ollanta Humala, a populist with ties to Venezuela's Hugo Chavez, led in the first round with just over 30%. Without a majority requirement and runoff, Humala would have won, contrary to the wishes of most Peruvians.

Majority Rule looks at presidential election systems in 28 democracies with high Freedom House ratings. 21 use runoffs and instant runoff voting to ensure majority winners. Two more use runoffs to ensure winners achieve minimum pluralities. Only one - the United States - has an Electoral College system that allows the popular vote winner to lose an election. Each system has important consequences for majority rule, voter choice and campaign style.

[ Read the abstract and download the paper in PDF ]


[ Previous ] [ Next ]  


IRV Action Kit Minibanner

Recent Articles
October 30th 2009
Don Fraser and George Latimer: The case for instant-runoff voting is clear
Star Tribune

Two former politicians tell St. Paul voters that IRV is "vitally important to us as citizens and as members of our communities."

October 29th 2009
Plurality voting rule is the real election spoiler
Baltimore Sun

In the midst of 3-way races in NJ and NY, FairVote board member and 1980 presidential candidate John Anderson makes the case for IRV over our flawed plurality system.

October 25th 2009
CHARTER AMENDMENT 3: County voters would lose power
The News Tribune

Amendment 3 to the Pierce county charter is an attempt by incumbent politicians to rig the system and prevent any serious challengers from competing. IRV is simply too fair and too democratic to not keep using in our electoral system.

October 22nd 2009
St. Paul should join IRV bandwagon
Star Tribune

Star Tribune stands behind IRV voting. They believe that if this system is used in St. Paul, it will show the state of Missouri that IRV can work and can better represent the voters in the state.