Majority rule and genuine voter choice are marks of a functioning democracy. To support voter choice in high turnout elections, we act to encourage understanding, adoption and effective implementation of instant runoff voting, a ranked choice voting system used in a growing number of American elections.


Colorado Progress for IRV
Aspen to Vote in November, Richie testifies to statewide task force
On September 4th the city council of Aspen, Colorado, voted 5-0 to place a measure on the November 6th ballot to adopt IRV for mayoral and city council elections. Backers include the Aspen Times and Colorado Common Cause.

FairVote's Rob Richie testified about IRV to the Aspen city council on August 20th. That same week, he presented on IRV and proportional voting for two hours to the statewide Voter Choice Task Force. Chaired by state representative John Kefalas and including leading state and local election administrators and civic leaders, the task force's final report is due later this year.

[Aspen Times editorial on IRV]
[Rob Richie's PowerPoint for Voter Choice Task Force]

[InstantRunoff.com]



IRV Moving Ahead
Three New Ballot Measures Proposed

Three more municipalities have placed ballot measures on instant runoff voting for November. Voters in Sarasota (FL), Aspen (CO) and Clallam County (WA) will each be considering the merits of this ranked choice voting method. IRV has won its last nine trials-by-ballot by an average two-to-one victory margin.

Reform-oriented citizens spearheaded a petition drive in Sarasota. The Clallam County Charter Review Commission voted unanimously for an enabling measure, while Aspen's city council voted unanimously to enact instant runoff voting for all city elections.

[Editorial from the Aspen Times in favor of election reform]
[Aspen Daily News on IRV ballot measure]



California Senate Committee Passes IRV Bills
Bills Would Allow IRV for non-charter cities and overseas voters

On July 10, both AB 1294 and AB 1662 passed the California Senate Committee on Elections, Reapportionment and Constitutional Amendments. Prior to the passage of AB 1294, only charter counties or cities could use ranked voting methods, leaving over three-fourths of cities and counties without such options. AB 1294 added to the California Election Code by outlining procedures for conducting ranked voting elections.

AB 1662 allows overseas military personnel to use ranked ballots when voting in local elections if a runoff election is to occur within 90 days of the original election. AB 1662, by providing a separate ballot to rank all candidates, protects against the disenfranchisement of military members overseas due to the limited time between primary and general elections.



[ Previous ] [ Next ]  


IRV Action Kit Minibanner

Recent Articles
October 30th 2009
Don Fraser and George Latimer: The case for instant-runoff voting is clear
Star Tribune

Two former politicians tell St. Paul voters that IRV is "vitally important to us as citizens and as members of our communities."

October 29th 2009
Plurality voting rule is the real election spoiler
Baltimore Sun

In the midst of 3-way races in NJ and NY, FairVote board member and 1980 presidential candidate John Anderson makes the case for IRV over our flawed plurality system.

October 25th 2009
CHARTER AMENDMENT 3: County voters would lose power
The News Tribune

Amendment 3 to the Pierce county charter is an attempt by incumbent politicians to rig the system and prevent any serious challengers from competing. IRV is simply too fair and too democratic to not keep using in our electoral system.

October 22nd 2009
St. Paul should join IRV bandwagon
Star Tribune

Star Tribune stands behind IRV voting. They believe that if this system is used in St. Paul, it will show the state of Missouri that IRV can work and can better represent the voters in the state.